CCMIN120611 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Dolan then described the total site acreage, stating that at least in one case, it is anticipated there will be rezoning of properties to a different designation but not to the 30 units per acre, such as the Gateway site. A portion of the site could be at a higher density to meet the housing need which will leave a remainder which now has an office approval. Staff proposes that the remainder come forward with a lower, more traditional low density residential zoning. Also discussed in the past have been the two levels of density needed. The 23 units per acre is intended to address moderate density homes, 30 units per acre is driven by components of State law, and select areas were chosen where higher density could be accommodated at 40 units per acre. Mr. Dolan said staff will discuss the 23 units per acre and moderate density which he said has evolved since issuance of the staff report. As the list is pared down, staff wanted to keep such criteria in mind such as geographic distribution throughout the City, elimination of concentrating units in any one area, sites that have existing utility infrastructure and street access, those that are consistent with General Plan themes and elements of it, that are transit-oriented, that have convenient freeway access, and those within a job center. Mr. Dolan said site specific criteria ended up driving some decisions include staff not including the downtown sites. There has been a theme of reserving the site for other civic uses which has not yet been resolved. The second theme which had a major impact is that they did not want to predispose any decisions within the East Pleasanton Specific Plan area which was discussed extensively by the task force, the Planning Commission and Council. While they think it is possible to consider land in the planning area, it is easier if they do not. He presented the map of the recommendations from the staff report which pared down the list. He said there were some changes based on criteria which resulted in reductions in the list. The East Pleasanton sites were left out which include: the Kiewit site (11); Legacy Partner site (14), the Downtown site (18), the small Axis Community Health site (17), and 4202 Stanley Boulevard site (21) which was at the request of the owner. Upon further consideration, site 21 owners realized that the densities required were not the best use of the site. In both cases, the owners and staff believe they are good residential redevelopment infill sites, but trying to force the densities would not produce the best project for that site. After revising the list, the total acreage was reduced from 111 acres down to 84 acres. Mr. Dolan said the revised recommendation is contained in a staff memorandum dated today, which is a subset of this list. The list pares down the 84 acres to just under 73 acres. From many people's perspective, less land would be rezoned with less impact on the community. Others think that the City should rezone as much as it can because of accommodation of the Housing Element. Staff was able to reduce the list to 73 acres because they did not give themselves credit for some of the housing affordable to moderate income families that would result from the Hacienda properties. This recommendation responds to the HCD comment that the City should not be counting projects they know about and where they know the percentage of affordable units in the project. Therefore, staff only counted the income-restricted units in the BRE development and everything after that which is left over will qualify as moderate. In fact, he said while they have had an on-going dialogue about needing more units affordable to moderate income families, that need would ultimately be addressed through the Hacienda projects. They would therefore not need to rezone anything other than 23 units per acre, but they need a full 70 acres at 30 units per acre. Mr. Dolan apologized for not incorporating this into the numbers and noted it was discussed in the past. This is similar in that it does not have East Pleasanton, Axis, the Downtown property or the small property on Stanley, but staff had to change some of the 23 units per acre sites to 30 units and then they were able to eliminate others to get down to the 73 acres. The first change was on the Irby-Kaplan-Zia site (6); which was at 23 units per acres for 6 acres. They eliminated this site because it was not needed. On the Pleasanton Gateway site (7) there has been a constant suggestion that it would fit in better with the neighborhood if there were less high density units. City Council Minutes Page 4 of 18 December 6, 2011