RES 12492 - Laserfiche WebLink

sensitivity for prehistoric sites, they may contain unknown archaeological resources. Site 7, for example, contains a Native American burial ground. 2. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.D-2 set forth in Table 6-1 of the Final SEIR and listed in the MMRP will ensure that Impact 4.D-2 would be reduced to a less than significant level and is hereby incorporated by reference and described below: 4.D-2: Prior to the issuance of grading permits for development on the potential sites for rezoning that have not been previously developed or have only experienced minimal disturbance, including Sites 6, 7, 8, and 18, the applicant shall submit to the City an archaeological mitigation program that has been prepared by a licensed archaeologist with input from a Native American Representative. The applicant shall implement the requirements and measures of this program, which will include, but not be limited to: Submission of periodic status reports to the City of Pleasanton and the NAHC. Submission of a final report, matching the format of the final report submitted for CA-Ala-613/H, dated March 2005, to the City and the NAHC. A qualified archaeologist and the Native American Representative designated by the NAHC will be present on site during the grading and trenching for the foundations, utility services, or other on-site excavation, in order to determine if any bone, shell, or artifacts are uncovered. If human remains are uncovered, the applicant will implement Mitigation Measure 4.D-4, below. Site(s) affected: Sites 6-8, 18 (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.D-16 to 4.D-17.) Impact 4.D-3 Development facilitated by the General Plan Amendment and rezonings may directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. The SEIR evaluates the impacts of the proposed project related to the potential destruction of unique paleontological resources or a unique geologic feature. The city has moderate paleontological sensitivity and it is possible that paleontological resources could be disturbed during construction activities. Significance Before Mitigation: Significant Significance After Mitigation: Less than Significant Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that would avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the SEIR. Mitigation Measure 4.D-3, which has been