My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 12492
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
RES 12492
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2012 4:03:35 PM
Creation date
1/13/2012 2:57:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/4/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RES 12492
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12. Recreation <br /> The Project would not result in any direct or cumulatively considerable significant <br /> adverse recreation impacts. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.M-8 to 4.M-11; Impacts 4.M-1 through 4.M-3.) <br /> 13. Transportation and Traffic <br /> The Project would not result in any impacts related to changes in air traffic <br /> patters. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.N-14 to 4.N-16.) <br /> The Project would not result in significant adverse traffic impacts at the local <br /> study intersections under existing plus Project conditions. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.N-16 to 4.N-20; <br /> Impact 4.N-1.) <br /> The Project would not result in significant adverse traffic safety hazards for <br /> vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.N-20 to 4.N-21; Impact 4.N-2.) <br /> The Project would not result in significant adverse traffic impacts related to <br /> service calls for emergency vehicles. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.N-21 to 4.N-22; Impact 4.N-3.) <br /> The Project would not result in significant adverse traffic impacts related to the <br /> creation of any inconsistencies with adopted policies, plans, and programs supporting <br /> alternative transportation. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.N-22 to 4.N-24; Impact 4.N-4.) <br /> The Project would not result in significant adverse temporary construction traffic <br /> impacts. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.N-24 to 4.N-25; Impact 4.N-5.) <br /> The Project would not result in any cumulatively considerable significant adverse <br /> traffic impacts under cumulative plus Project conditions. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.N-25 to 4.N-30; <br /> Impact 4.N-6.) <br /> 14. Agricultural Resources <br /> The Project would have no impacts on agricultural resources and would not <br /> result in the loss of forest land or convert forest land to non-forest uses. (Draft SEIR, p. 6-9.) <br /> 15. Mineral Resources <br /> The Project would have no impacts on mineral resources. (Draft SEIR, pp. 6-9 to <br /> 6-10.) <br /> J. Less Than Significant Impacts With Mitigation Incorporated <br /> The SEIR determined that the Project has potentially significant environmental <br /> impacts in the areas discussed below and identified feasible mitigation measures to avoid or <br /> substantially reduce some or all of the environmental impacts in these areas. Based on the <br /> information and analyses set forth in the Draft and Final SEIRs, all but two of the Project <br /> impacts will be avoided or substantially reduced to less than significant with identified feasible <br /> mitigation measures incorporated into the Project. <br /> The City Council agrees with the characterization in the SEIR with respect to all <br /> impacts initially identified as "significant" or "potentially significant" that would be rendered less <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.