My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
011712
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2012 1:20:40 PM
Creation date
1/13/2012 1:15:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/17/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
adjustments will be made to get the Sustainable Communities Strategy and regional transportation <br /> funding all on the same cycles. <br /> Mr. Dolan added that "RHNA" stands for Regional Housing Needs Allocation. Approximately every 5-7 <br /> years the State determines what the housing needs statewide will be and they, or ABAG in the City's <br /> case, assigns the numbers to the various metropolitan areas. ABAG distributes allocations to all 9 <br /> counties and to the cities within them. Cities then determine where housing can be located within their <br /> respective communities. <br /> Mr. Dolan continued his presentation, stating the City submitted a Draft Housing Element to the State <br /> for review and initial feedback and work was conducted addressing the various sites. He presented a <br /> graphic of the 17 sites included in the submission which were evaluated in the EIR and presented a <br /> graphic of those having 23 units to the acre, a category which the City no longer must address but <br /> could utilize in the future. The list of sites had to be paired down closer to the actual need for sites and <br /> certain criteria were considered which were discussed at the joint session. He noted there have been <br /> themes of discussion for quite some time as well as themes and decisions made more recently which <br /> he briefly outlined. He then presented a map of the shortened list and said the original list totaled 111 <br /> acres which was shortened to 72.8 acres to accommodate 2,326 units, which is 238 units over the <br /> minimum the City needs to provide. While it is a small number of added units, staff is comfortable with <br /> this cushion as additional comments may be heard on some of the sites from HCD when the final <br /> document is submitted. <br /> Councilmember McGovern suggested the possible need for two changes; Stoneridge Shopping Center <br /> did not want to go to 400 units and 40 units per acre, and CarrAmerica indicated they were willing to go <br /> to 35 units per acre. She asked if these changes would be made. Mr. Dolan clarified that Stoneridge did <br /> not want to go to 50 units per acre, not 40 units per acre. <br /> Councilmember Thorne said the Growth Management Plan indicates that the City will meet its RHNA <br /> numbers and questioned if this would remove that cushion if everything were approved by HCD. Mr. <br /> Dolan said it possibly could if the City actually built that many units, but it is unlikely this many <br /> applications would be received. Mr. Fialho said if the Growth Management Ordinance is built around <br /> the premise that it cannot exceed RHNA, then the City is left with the cushion that it can, on a case-by- <br /> case basis, then decide whether the City wants to absorb this through an approval that may come at <br /> some point in the future. Or, the Council could structure it in a way where it just is going to meet RHNA <br /> numbers and the delta of 243 units gets credited to the next RHNA cycle. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio said the Council has received comments worrying about the cushion. She <br /> said it is important to understand that these numbers float to the next RHNA cycle and the City is not <br /> doing more than it has to. <br /> Mr. Dolan continued his reply, stating that CarrAmerica agreed to 35 units per acre which is contained <br /> in the footnote in the report. He then re-clarified with Councilmember Sullivan that Stoneridge Mall is <br /> still at 40 units per acre. The City needed 2,088 units and the City is providing 2,326 units, leaving a <br /> cushion of 238 units. He said the Council can discuss variations, ask questions on individual sites, and <br /> if there are changes that the City's ultimate inventory be no more than half at mixed use, some of the <br /> sites will not work if they are just zoned as HDR without the mixed use, which he said will also need to <br /> be discussed. <br /> Mr. Dolan added that the balance of the task force and subsequent discussions has been about the <br /> balance of multi-family housing throughout the City, and pointed out was that it was unfair to look at <br /> sites with other previously approved multi-family housing. He presented a graphic showing a sense of <br /> City Council Minutes Page 4 of 13 January 4, 2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.