My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
011712
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2012 1:20:40 PM
Creation date
1/13/2012 1:15:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/17/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Julie Testa said when addressing schools growth must pay for itself and cannot be a burden to existing <br /> residents. It must be mitigated and good for the community <br /> Councilmember Sullivan said in parallel with the Housing Element Update, the City is working on new <br /> growth management strategies and there is a subcommittee working on some of the strategies. He <br /> asked for an update on this. Mr. Fialho said the subcommittee met this last week to discuss preliminary <br /> findings. There was concurrence to place the matter before the Council for discussion and public <br /> discussion in mid-January, either concurrent with the adoption of the Housing Element or shortly <br /> following its adoption. <br /> Councilmember McGovern asked whether this topic had been discussed at the liaison committee level <br /> between the School District and the City. Mr. Fialho said yes; quite a bit. Councilmembers Thorne and <br /> Cook-Kallio serve on that committee. They have talked a lot about the requirements under the court <br /> order to fulfill as it relates to the rezonings and adoption of the Housing Element. They talked a lot <br /> about how this rezoning and bringing the General Plan into compliance with State law, while initiating <br /> rezoning, it puts them just slightly over what was known as the housing cap. This assumed 29,000 units <br /> at build-out, and the City currently has about 275,000 units built, and the City must accommodate about <br /> 3200 additional new units. So, it is not necessarily inconsistent with some of the assumptions made in <br /> the General Plan in 2009. Notwithstanding that, Ms. Testa is correct; there will be an impact and both <br /> agencies must sit down and talk about it and accommodate for it. Additionally, he said unfortunately, <br /> like so many other things, the District's ability to mitigate impacts through the collection of fees has <br /> been taken away from the school district, and in its place, the State has imposed the collection of a <br /> state-mandated minimum fee. There is a broad acknowledgement that this simply is not enough. The <br /> art of solving this problem will require a lot of dialogue between the School District and City Council. <br /> Councilmember McGovern questioned and confirmed with Mr. Fialho that the item will be agendized at <br /> the next joint meeting in March. Mr. Fialho agreed also with Ms. Testa in that there is a division of <br /> responsibility between the two entities, and it is important to talk about this and educate the public, as <br /> well. In this City, they have a history of working collaboratively to solve these problems. <br /> Mayor Hosterman suggested also determining how other cities are dealing with this problem because <br /> everyone is under the unfunded mandate and perhaps it could be raised at the Mayors' Conference or <br /> collectively put pressure on State legislators. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> 13. Continued Public Hearing: PUD-50-01M, Ponderosa Homes, Carol Lehman, and William and <br /> Kathryn Selway— Consider a Major Modification to the Planned Unit Development to increase the <br /> number of lots on an approx. 19.47 acre site at 3157 Trenery Dr. and 2313 Martin Ave. from 27 to <br /> 31; to construct 29 single-story homes from the previous combination of 25 homes, to change the <br /> house designs and sizes; on/off site modifications; amendment to the low-income housing <br /> agreement; and certify the Negative Declaration for said project <br /> This item was continued to the December 6, 2011 City Council meeting. <br /> 14. Public Hearing: PUD-93-02-10M, Arpad Nagy — Consider an application for a Major Modification <br /> to extend the approvals for two years, to expire on August 16, 2013, for an approved project at <br /> 2001 Ruby Hill Blvd. (PUD-93-02-09M/PCUP-182) to (1) relocate existing sales office building on <br /> Ruby Hill Blvd. northwesterly along Vineyard Ave.;(2) change existing office use to restaurant use; <br /> (3) establish pad location and design guidelines for a future single-family residence; and (4) a <br /> Conditional Use Permit to allow alcoholic beverage service at the restaurant after 10 p.m. Zoning <br /> is PUD —A/OS/LDR (Agriculture/Open Space/Low Density Residential) District <br /> City Council Minutes Page 3 of 5 November 15, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.