My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
011712
>
06 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2012 12:02:15 PM
Creation date
1/13/2012 12:02:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/17/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE-OPENED. <br /> Chair Narum informed that applicant that the Commission has a fairly impacted <br /> schedule and in fairness to him to get a final vote one way or the other, the Commission <br /> has a Special Meeting on November 30th and is considering making a motion to <br /> schedule the hearing to a date specific which would be at that meeting, with the item <br /> being first on the agenda. <br /> Mr. Cunningham replied that it should not be a problem. He inquired what he should do <br /> then, if he needed to make a ten-minute presentation again. <br /> Chair Narum suggested that he speak with Ms. Amos and she would walk him through <br /> what was appropriate in terms of what he needs to present. <br /> In terms of the two "no" votes, Mr. Cunningham inquired what he could do to make it <br /> pass. He indicated that there is no way he can do without a second story, so it the <br /> issue is the second story, then there is no purpose to move forward. He noted that he <br /> needs some guidance and would like answers to some general questions. <br /> Chair Narum asked Ms. Seto if this is an appropriate dialogue to have. <br /> Ms. Seto replied that since the Commission has already taken a vote to continue the <br /> matter, there should not be a prolonged discussion. She advised the applicant that he <br /> has the right to contact each of the Commissioners, have a discussion about these <br /> kinds of concerns because this is not the time to discuss design issues. <br /> Chair Narum requested Ms. Amos to set up a meeting as soon as possible for <br /> Mr. Cunningham to meet with Chair Narum and Commissioner Pearce. <br /> Ms. Seto advised that the Commissioners present not talk to Commissioner Blank either <br /> to fill him in on what happened but to leave it to him to listen to the recording of the <br /> meeting. <br /> Mr. Cunningham suggested if the two Commissioners could come up with some ideas <br /> at the meeting so he and his architect could put something together before the <br /> November 30 s hmeeting. He indicated that he would love to start construction next <br /> spring. <br /> Chair Narum and Commissioner Pearce indicated that was good. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE-OPENED. <br /> Bob Byrd inquired if the netting could come down. <br /> Chair Narum commented that it is a very fair question. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, NOVEMBER 9, 2011 Page 16 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.