06 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Olson inquired if the Commission could simply forward this to the City Council. Ms. Seto said no. She explained that a tie vote means no action; it is neither a denial nor an approval and, therefore, there is no action to appeal. Commissioner Olson moved to continue the item. Commissioner Pearce seconded the motion, with an amendment that it be continued to a date when there is a 5th Commissioner or an odd number of Commissioners present. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Narum, Olson, Pearce, and Pentin NOES: None ABSTAIN: None RECUSED: Commissioner O'Connor ABSENT: Commissioner Blank Commissioner Olson asked if a Special Meeting could be called. Mr. Dolan replied that November 30th is already a special meeting. He indicated that if the Commission is willing to hear the item that night, it should just pick that night, and there is a chance that the bigger item would fall off. He added that there are a few other minor things on that agenda as well. He indicated that the fact that the Commission has already had the public hearing on this item would mean that the discussion would not necessarily have to be an extensive. He added that Commissioner Blank could read the Minutes and get up to speed. Commissioner Pearce inquired if this could go first on the agenda and before the larger item. Mr. Dolan said yes. Chair Narum that the other item is date-sensitive and has to be done. Commissioner Pearce noted that this item is continued and inquired if it does not get bumped up to the top of the agenda. Mr. Dolan stated that presumably, the second time around, it would not have quite as much public comment. Chair Narum inquired if a motion was needed for this. Mr. Dolan replied that he thinks it is worth it to shoot for November 30th, assuming that the applicant is available then. EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, NOVEMBER 9, 2011 Page 15 of 17