Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Martin replied that wha, which the City <br />th <br />Attorney will review, that this would become a decision of the residents once the 11 <br />th <br />sale is completed. He noted that after the 11 unit is sold, the builder would <br />theoretically have two votes for the two remaining units, assuming all the units have not <br />yet been sold. With respect to the funding of the tot lot, he proposed that to guarantee <br />their performance, it could be included in the subdivision bond which will guarantee all <br />performance under the conditions. <br /> <br />Emilie Cruzan stated that she has addressed the Commission before about the <br />development and indicated that her desire is that the heritage trees be retained on <br />Stanley Boulevard. She expressed her disappointment that the developer is still <br />insisting on removing the trees and instead of replacing them with comparable heritage <br />trees, will put in houses. She noted that once the houses are built, there will be no <br />ability for trees of that size to be on that street in that location. <br /> <br />Ms. Cruzan stated that the Deodar Cedars are only 25 feet from the property line. She <br />noted that most of the acreage is bare so there is plenty of room for a lot of the units <br />without removing the trees. She indicated that these trees are important because of <br />their proximity in the neighborhood to the creek, they filter out noise from the train and <br />particulate matter from the street, they provide a habitat for a lot of animals, and they <br /> She asked the Commission to consider this when it <br />makes its decision. <br /> <br />Ms. Cruzan also questioned the process, stating that she was under the impression that <br />when applicants receive direction from the Planning Commission and City Council they <br />are required to consider it strongly. She noted that it appears that the applicant has not <br />done that as the plan is basically the same plan they came up with in the first place, with <br />the exception of the little change in the parking and one change in the lot. She <br />indicated that she was not sure what that means for the process and that she was <br />surprised to find so little compliance with the Commission's recommendations. <br /> <br />Chair Narum advised that she would have staff respond to the question at the end of the <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Christine Bourg, speaking in place of Linda Garbarino, President of Pleasanton Heritage <br />Association (PHA), who is attending another meeting. She stated that PHA agrees <br />basically with Ms. saving as many of the trees as <br />possible and that she was happy to hear Mr. Fulford's report that two of the Deodar <br />Cedars can be saved, and hopefully others can be as well. She added that she would <br />be interested in hearing the discussion about that. <br /> <br />Ms. Bourg stated that PHA has several concerns and observations, one of which is the <br />missed opportunities for historic Downtown, specifically the protection of historic <br />neighborhoods and homes. She noted that Stanley Boulevard has continued to <br />deteriorate over the last 15-20 years since the first home was demolished there and a <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 13, 2011 Page 7 of 21 <br /> <br />