Laserfiche WebLink
this mitigation is infeasible and is unacceptable from a design and neighborhood impact <br /> standpoint. <br /> The City Council evaluated the requirement to achieve the General Plan noise <br /> standards with this development at its public hearing and Councilmember Sullivan <br /> requested that an addendum to the noise analysis for train horns be completed for the <br /> interior spaces of each of the proposed homes. The addendum is part of Exhibit L. It <br /> analyzed the noise levels for Lot 1, Lot 6, Lot 7, and Lot 8. <br /> As shown on "Table 1: Train Horn Interior Maximum Noise Levels, dBA" of the noise <br /> addendum, the operation of train horns will generate from 89 dBA to 112 dBA at a 75- <br /> foot distance from the train; that STC 46 rated doors/windows will reduce interior noise <br /> levels by 41 dB for Lot 6, Lot 7, and Lot 8, the lots adjoining the railroad right-of-way; <br /> and that STC 28 rated doors/windows will reduce the interior noise levels by 20 dB for <br /> Lot 1 facing Stanley Boulevard. Table 2, below, copies a portion of the table in the <br /> noise addendum and shows the interior noise levels for train horns. <br /> Table 2: Interior Noise Levels Due to Train Horns/Whistles <br /> Lot Window STC Noise Interior Sound Level Interior Sound Level <br /> Rating Reduction (Master Bedroom) (Bedroom Two) <br /> 1 28 20 dBA 41 dBA to 64 dBA 52 dBA to 75 dBA <br /> 6 46 _ 41 dBA 44 dBA to 67 dBA 51 dBA to 74 dBA_ <br /> 7 46 41 dBA 41 dBA to 64 dBA 45 dBA to 68 dBA _ <br /> 8 46 41 dBA 41 dBA to 64 dBA 51 dBA to 74 dBA J <br /> The train horn sound levels of the Lot 1 Bedroom Two interior is louder than for Lot 6, <br /> Lot 7, and Lot 8 because the STC rating of the Lot 1 windows does not need to be as <br /> high in order to mitigate the train engine/wheel noise. Train horns are operated to warn <br /> motorists and pedestrians of an oncoming train and generate very loud noise levels <br /> lasting a short duration; for this reason, train horns cannot be effectively mitigated by <br /> residential developments. The only effective mitigation would be if the Union Pacific <br /> Railroad and Ace Train were to not use their horns. The use of warming horns is <br /> regulated by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) of the Department of <br /> Transportation (DOT), which supersedes the City's authority. <br /> The Planning Commission may wish to discuss requiring up to STC-46 rated doors and <br /> windows for all of the proposed homes within this development in order to further <br /> mitigate train horn noise. The applicant, however, does not concur with this <br /> requirement due to the costs associated with producing STC-46 windows, their <br /> appearance, and the potential conflict of such a requirement with the window design <br /> requirement that the applicant has accepted. <br /> Vibration <br /> As required by the General Plan, the noise study includes an analysis of railroad- <br /> induced ground vibration. The General Plan requires that the project demonstrate that it <br /> would be compatible with the vibration impact criteria established by the Federal Transit <br /> Administration (FTA). The study indicates that the homes on Lot 6, Lot 7, and Lot 8 will <br /> need to have spread foundation footings or post/beam foundations, resulting in a raised <br /> Item 6.a., PUD-82 Page 18 of 22 July 13, 2011 <br />