My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
23
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
081611
>
23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2011 2:55:25 PM
Creation date
8/10/2011 1:12:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/16/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PERS thus protecting the fiscal integrity of cities and PERS retirement for public employees. <br /> This could include jointly sponsoring an initiative if legislative change is insufficient. <br /> ACTIONS CITIES CAN AND ARE TAKING NOW AT THE COLLECTIVE <br /> BARGAINING TABLE TO REDUCE COSTS <br /> 1. Have employees pay the employee's share of PERS costs: 7-8% for miscellaneous <br /> employees and 8-9% for safety employees. <br /> 2. Provide a two-tier retirement system with new hires being placed in a reduced benefit <br /> tier. <br /> 3. Allow employees to pick-up a portion of the employer's PERS costs up to PERS limits <br /> through negotiation to better share the normal costs of pensions. <br /> 4. Base final retirement salary on the three highest years worked. <br /> 5. Eliminate the PERS contract option of including Employer Paid Member Contribution <br /> (EPMC) in the calculation of an employee's base pay for retirement purposes. <br /> A City Managers Department survey in February 2011 indicates one in five cities responding to <br /> the survey have implemented a second tier for new hires. Further,the majority of cities surveyed <br /> (61%) are currently negotiating pension reforms. <br /> ACTIONS NEEDED FROM THE STATE TO RESTORE THE SUSTAINABILITY OF <br /> PENSION PROGRAMS <br /> Courts have held that current and former local government employees have rights to the pensions <br /> promised them at hiring. As such, the following recommendations most likely would not pertain <br /> to former employees or the prospective benefits of current employees. <br /> A Defined Benefit Plan is the most effective vehicle to accumulate and distribute pension <br /> benefits and is the preferred retirement system for municipal employees. According to staff of <br /> the National Institute of Retirement Security, dollar for dollar, a Defined Benefit Plan yields <br /> considerably more(46%)retirement savings than a Defined Contribution Plan. <br /> The subsequent action items can be considered individually or in combination to improve the <br /> sustainability of PERS, thus, re-designing a system that will contribute to safeguarding public <br /> pensions. The following recommendations, with support from labor, would level the field on a <br /> statewide basis and lead to a maintainable PERS for public employees. <br /> 1. Repeal SB400/AB616 returning to more sustainable PERS benefit formulas of 2% at 60 <br /> for miscellaneous employees and 2%at 55 for safety employees. <br /> 2. Have PERS provide more formula choices with lower benefit local options. <br /> 3. Base final retirement salary on three highest paid years worked. <br /> 4. Prohibit enhancing the second tier pension formulas for twenty years. <br /> 5. Calculate benefits only on base salary eliminating all "spiking."No overtime, vacation or <br /> sick leave included in the pension calculation. <br /> 6. Eliminating the purchase of"air time"(purchase of time not served). <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.