My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
23
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
081611
>
23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2011 2:55:25 PM
Creation date
8/10/2011 1:12:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/16/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PENSION REFORM ACTION PLAN <br /> City Manager's Department <br /> June 10,2011 <br /> This report to the League of California Cities Employee Relations and Revenue and Taxation <br /> Policy Committees and the Board of Directors is designed to address the League's 2011 Strategic <br /> Goal related to Pension Sustainability by providing information and recommendations that may <br /> be of assistance toward meeting the competing challenges of maintaining high-quality public <br /> services while providing fair and reasonable pensions for employees. <br /> THE PROBLEM <br /> Pension costs for many California municipalities continue to increase, threatening the delivery of <br /> basic public services, compromising general fund budgets, and indeed, posing a long-term fiscal <br /> challenge to the State itself. A former CaIPERS actuary warned that by 2014 it will be common <br /> for local governments to budget 50% of a police officer's salary, 40% of a fire fighter's salary <br /> and 25% of a miscellaneous employee's salary for their pensions; contributions that are fiscally <br /> unsustainable. Many cities face 25% or more increases in pension contribution costs in the next <br /> three years and those rates arc likely to remain high for a decade or more. <br /> Causes of the problem include: <br /> 1. Large losses on pension investments due to the Great Recession. <br /> 2. Enhanced benefit formulas granted after 1999(SB400/AB616). <br /> 3. Increased life span of retired employees. <br /> A PRINCIPLED APPROACH <br /> Public retirement systems should provide fair benefits for career employees, and: <br /> 1. Recognize the value of attracting and retaining high performing public employees to <br /> design and deliver vital public services to local communities. <br /> 2. Recognize and support the value of a dependable, sustainable, employer provided <br /> Defined Benefits Plan (DBP) for career employees; supplemented with other retirement <br /> options including personal savings(e.g. 457 Plan). <br /> 3. Public pension costs should be shared by employees and employers(taxpayers). <br /> 4. Be portable across all public agencies to sustain a competent cadre of California public <br /> servants. <br /> STAGES OF A SOLUTION <br /> Many of the steps below can, are, and should be taken locally and immediately, as part of the <br /> collective bargaining process to move local pension costs in a more sustainable direction. <br /> Further, State action is necessary to return the PERS (or other state-authorized pension systems) <br /> to a more sustainable framework. Many of the actions below are and will be presented to the <br /> State Legislature for enactment. We believe the League of California Cities should engage the <br /> unions, Legislature, and Governor in the legislative process to formally change the structure of <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.