My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN062111SP
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
CCMIN062111SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2011 2:28:57 PM
Creation date
7/21/2011 3:22:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/21/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN062111SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
expenditure obligations for the City. They have said that upon adoption of the Housing Element <br /> which will occur at the end of the calendar year, they will have a good sense of what build-out <br /> looks like over the next 10 years. Ms. Wagner has begun to prepare what the City's revenue <br /> forecasts are and what their expenditure obligations are from a service delivery standpoint. This <br /> will be the appropriate time for the Council to have a comprehensive discussion on what service <br /> levels look like at General Plan build-out, what is the expectation, and how does staff deliver it, <br /> measure it, and manage costs. <br /> Mr. Fialho suggested bifurcating the operating budget which needs to be adopted, discussion <br /> about pension reform, and thirdly, a longer term planning and fiscal study that takes the City <br /> beyond 10 years and factors in residential development and commercial growth, plan for service <br /> delivery and revenue forecasting in a very comprehensive fiscal model, which Ms. Wagner <br /> would prepare for the Council. <br /> Councilmember Thorne asked that Mr. Fialho's suggestions replace the original motion. <br /> MODIFIED MOTION: It was m/s by Thorne/Sullivan to 1) adopt Resolution 11-464 approving <br /> the 2011/12FY and 2012/13FY Operating Budgets and the 2011/12FY Community <br /> Development Block Grant Program; 2) that the City Council hold discussion regarding pension <br /> reform; and 3) that staff prepare, the Council discuss, a longer term planning and fiscal study <br /> that takes the City beyond 10 years and one which factors in residential development and <br /> commercial growth and plans for service delivery and revenue forecasting in a very <br /> comprehensive fiscal model. Motion carried by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Sullivan, Thorne, Vice Mayor Cook-Kallio <br /> Noes: None <br /> Absent: Councilmember McGovern, Mayor Hosterman <br /> BREAK: Vice Mayor Cook-Kallio called for a 5-minute break at 8:53 p.m., and thereafter, the <br /> Council reconvened their regular meeting. <br /> 21. Adoption of the Four Year Capital Improvement Program for fiscal years 2011-2012 <br /> through 2014-2015 <br /> Mr. Bocian gave a PowerPoint presentation of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and <br /> provided an overview and explanation of the CIP, which he explained is a comprehensive fiscal <br /> plan for capital improvements over the next 5 years through dedicated funding sources. The first <br /> two years of the plan are funded, the City holds a mid-term session prior to the start of the next <br /> fiscal year and the final two years are for planning purposes. <br /> The CIP is comprised of 47 projects in the first two years and 50 in total. Expenditures are at <br /> $36 million and total revenue is $53.9 million. He described staffs review of projected funding <br /> sources, City Council priorities, meet with department managers, utilize analytical tools, and <br /> establish replacement schedules, and gave an overview of financial resources and planning <br /> assumptions made in the CIP, stating that assuming no changes are made, the City will have a <br /> balance of $17 million. <br /> Mr. Bocian discussed sources of revenues, projected transfer of General Fund monies in the <br /> final two years of the CIP, funds used in street projects, anticipated development revenues, a <br /> comparison between 2009/10 and 2011/12, the comparison annually between the amount of <br /> revenue and expenditures, and ending fund balances. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 6 of 9 June 21,2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.