Laserfiche WebLink
finance staff handles, at a current rate of return of 1.8%. The City's current borrowing rate would <br /> be 4.23%. <br /> Staff prepared a net present value analysis, which identified a net payoff savings, even with <br /> borrowed funds at 4.23%, of $1.5 million. Net present value of that payoff is $1.3 million. The <br /> net present value rule states that any time the net present value savings exceeds $1 the <br /> alternative should be undertaken. Therefore, the overwhelming recommendation is for the City <br /> to pay off the unfunded liability. <br /> Benefits of paying off the side fund are that the employer rate would immediately drop to <br /> 24.112% from the 33.35%, which represents approximately $1 million savings in annual PERS <br /> costs. Additionally, an early payoff would result in a potential savings of up to $3.5 million in <br /> future interest costs. <br /> Ms. Wagner noted that the budget presented does not reflect this savings, which staff would <br /> recommend adding to the $3 million already proposed for transfer into the Retiring Medical <br /> Reserves. Over the two-year budget cycle, the City would have paid back $5 million of the $7.8 <br /> million borrowed. The Finance Committee has reviewed the proposal and recommended that <br /> the Council review and approve the item. Staff will return for Council action on June 7th, with the <br /> payment to occur no later than July 1, 2011. <br /> Councilmember Thorne asked Ms. Wagner to speculate on the costs if the City had not been <br /> required to join the risk pool. Ms. Wagner said it is near impossible to determine the City's exact <br /> unfunded liability since it is accounted for on a pool basis. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio asked if there are any benefits to the risk pool. Ms. Wagner stated that <br /> the purpose was to make the administration easier and arguably, to reduce costs. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio questioned and confirmed that the fire department, as sworn officers, <br /> could not have been pooled with police. <br /> Councilmember McGovern questioned and confirmed that the employer rate of 33.35% does <br /> not include the 9% employee portion. <br /> Councilmember McGovern noted this equals an extraordinary combined rate of roughly 41% <br /> and asked if it has ever reached this level before. Ms. Wagner said "no." Mr. Fialho expanded <br /> on this, stating that rates have increased from the 20s since 2007/08, which is why the City is <br /> now in this position of having employees pick up their incremental share. <br /> 3. Review updated user fees for development related services <br /> Ms. Wagner provided a brief overview of development relate services. She stated that the City's <br /> fiscal policy is that development is to pay 100% of its cost of services. In 2009, the City hired <br /> Public Resource Management and completed a study of the development related user fees, <br /> which have not been reviewed since 1992. At that time, the economy was in a similar <br /> depression and it was determined that a majority of the fees should remain at their 1980s levels. <br /> The results of the latest study found that the City achieved approximately 45% cost recovery in <br /> 2007/08. The study recommendation was to increase the fees to achieve an 80% cost recovery, <br /> an annual construction cost index increase, and a biannual review and update of the fees as <br /> well as to work towards 100% cost recovery. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 8 of 10 May 17, 2011 <br />