My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062211
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 062211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
7/18/2011 3:26:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/22/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Olson agreed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank stated that he personally was not comfortable with doing this but <br />that had a good point that by doing this, clear <br />notification is provided that this is within the realm of possibility. <br /> <br />Chair Narum stated that she would like to send a strong message to the owners that <br />they will need to get started on the outreach in the meantime and before it returns for <br />the final rezoning. She noted that if this is not done, she will not be happy about <br />considering keeping the site at 11.5 acres. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she had brought up an issue with the Task Force <br />regarding the Downtown site (SF Site 18). She noted that this site had been taken off <br />the list, and at a meeting that she missed, the site was put back on the list to <br />compensate for the loss of another larger property, the Valley Trails site. <br /> <br />Chair Narum interjected that the two Councilmembers who are members of the Task <br />Force were not at the meeting where the Task Force voted not to include the site, and <br />they came back and wanted it back on. She noted that many of the members went <br />along with this, and a small minority held their ground who did not think it made sense. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that at the last Task Force meeting, she proposed that the <br />site be removed from the list for a variety of reasons. She indicated that she believes <br />once a site was voted out, it was gone. She further indicated that she believes there is <br />a lot of valuable opportunity at that site as a gateway to the City, and as part of a <br />potential new library with City Hall right there. She noted that when the Task Force <br />members went through each of the sites, many sites got a majority of people agreeing, <br />but there was none on Site 18. She stated that she would like to see if she could get <br />support from the Commission to remove that small site it from the list at least for this <br />round. <br /> <br />requested if the Commission could also discuss Sunol <br />Boulevard and Sonoma Drive (Site 19) and Sunol Boulevard and Sycamore Road <br />(Site 20) in that same context. He stated that he does not think he had seen them <br />before and noted that they have "n/a" on the list under score. He inquired if they were <br />discussed at length at the Task Force meetings or if they were last-minute add-ons. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that they were later add-ons but they were discussed at a <br />couple of the Task Force meetings; the property owners were contacted and the <br />feedback received was that they were generally favorable. <br /> <br />Chair Narum indicated that one of the criteria the Task Force used was that if a property <br />owner was not interested in rezoning, the Task Force immediately took the site off the <br />list. She stated that as the process moved on, the owners of the Auto Mall site on Old <br />Santa Rita Road which was on the list subsequently indicated that they had other plans <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2011 Page 28 of 33 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.