Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Stern said yes; there was a specific vote on that. She added that there was a lot of <br />discussion about the amount of high-density housing around that immediate area, as <br />well as about the viability of the shopping center itself which has languished for many <br />years and is finally getting some life back in it. She indicated that some members <br />wanted to give it a chance. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Comments from the Property Owners/Developers/Representatives <br /> <br />Pat Costanzo, representing Kiewit (Site 11), stated that Kiewit has operated as a <br />business in Pleasanton for 45 years and asked the Commissioner to support the <br />ten-acre allocation for its site. He displayed a map <br />showing where the best ten-acre location would be on the property, which is at the <br />corner of Valley Avenue and Busch Road, with the remaining property adjacent to the <br />east allowing for an overall well planned mixed-use community as development of the <br />property proceeds. <br /> <br />Mr. Costanzo stated that at the last Task Force meeting, a desire was expressed that if <br />the Kiewit site and the adjacent Site 14 were allocated density, building not start until <br />the Specific Plan is completed. He indicated that while Kiewit believes its property and <br />the ten acres could be developed earlier than that, it agreed to wait as long as there is a <br />set timeframe for the Specific Plan to be completed, and if that timeframe was not met, <br />Kiewit would have the right to develop then. He added that the recommendation at that <br />Task Force meeting was to start the Specific Plan by the first quarter of 2012 and have <br />it completed by the second quarter of 2013, with the Specific Plan and the project <br />entitlement being processed concurrently during the 18-month period. <br /> <br />Mr. Costanzo noted that there were two issues that came up through all the hearings: <br />the first related to too much density in this area. He noted that based on a Google <br />aerial map which he displayed, there is only one true high density in the area, an <br />apartment complex; the other surrounding high density sites have only 8 to 15 units to <br />the acre, a senior housing is located across from the Kiewit property, and the other <br />property is the Legacy Partners (Site 14). He concluded, therefore, that there is a fair <br />allocation if these two sites are zoned as recommended and that it is not overburdening <br />the area. <br /> <br />Mr. Costanzo stated that the second issue refers to traffic concerns. He noted that at <br />the last Task Force meeting, Mike Tassano, City Traffic Engineer, presented a traffic <br />analysis showing that developing all the proposed sites in the area will not trigger any <br />level of service (LOS) past LOS D. He added that this is also looking at the whole <br />holding capacity for the Kiewit site, which has over 500,000 square feet of R&D that is <br />certainly not being developed right now. He stated that he is respectfully simply <br />pointing out that by giving Kiewit this density, the issues that were raised would not be <br />really issues. He requested that the Commission support leaving the ten acres on the <br />site. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2011 Page 14 of 33 <br /> <br />