Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Stern noted that the total number of sites adds up to 3,000 units. She pointed out <br />that as discussed in an earlier Commission meeting, the City needs to identify sites for <br />at least 2,000 units consisting of about 330 units at 23 units per acre and almost <br />1,700 units at 30+ units per acre. She noted that the number on units is running a <br />surplus at this point and the discussion is whether or not the Commission wants the list <br />to ride through to the EIR process and through the HCD review in order to receive its <br />comments and then make a decision based on that. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan noted that obviously there is a big surplus. He stated that it would be hard to <br />imagine that ultimately, when the rezonings are done, the City would rezone <br />significantly more than it needed to; however, the City would like to reserve some of <br />these because this is not the only Housing Element and RHNA assignment the City will <br />have; the City will have them on a regular basis as it moves forward. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan stated that his thinking on this has evolved. He noted that he spent a few of <br />the Task Force meetings encouraging the members to try and narrow the list down and <br />to provide more input as it moves forward ultimately for the City Council. He indicated <br />that he now believes that this does not necessarily have to be done because all the <br />discussions about which sites should stay and be removed were predicated on "what if" <br />scenarios, many of which had to do with the reaction of the HCD to individual sites. He <br />noted that at this time, he does not see any harm in leaving the list large, getting the <br />feedback from HCD, and then making those decisions. He recommended leaving the <br />list large at this point, with a few exceptions of any sites on the list the Commission <br />could not support under any circumstances. He commented, though, that he does not <br />know if there are any that would fall under that category as most of these sites have <br />been pretty well vetted, with the exception of the ones that were added towards the end, <br />but for which a public outreach meeting was held this week. He added that all the sites <br />have been determined by most people who have reviewed them as good housing sites, <br />so it is a matter of picking the right combination among them. He stated that he thinks <br />the decision to narrow the list down might be easier after the City has heard from the <br />HCD because its comments might make those decisions easier; for example, if there <br />are certain themes of sites the HCD is not supportive of, that dialogue would change <br />significantly rather than just trying to guess its reaction at this point. <br /> <br />Additionally, Mr. Dolan stated that he thinks it is all right to talk about any variation on <br />the density on individual sites. He indicated that on some of the sites, the Task Force <br />considered 23 units versus 30 units to the acre, and he indicated that this is useful <br />information as it moves forward. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank agreed with Mr. Dolan's recommended approach and indicated <br />that he was not sure it made a lot of sense to make any recommendations on the sites <br />before hearing back from the HCD. He indicated that he was curious about why <br />Site 16, Vintage Hills Shopping Center, was taken off the list and inquired if that was <br />done as a result of a Task Force vote. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2011 Page 13 of 33 <br /> <br />