My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 060811
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 060811
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
7/18/2011 3:24:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/8/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Jansen stated that the easement is simply a question of semantics. He pointed out <br />pointed out that he will be submitting a request to vacate the easement because a full <br />legal deeded frontage will be provided on Cindy Way for the new lot for the relocated <br />home, which will then render the easement issue moot. He explained that originally, the <br />clause was a direct consequence of the Jonebmission for the 20-foot <br />easement to be expanded and become the main traffic access thoroughfare for the <br />future developed Roselyn Estates development. He indicated that he had requested <br />Planning staff at that time that this not become a street entrance; hence, the clause was <br />added that <br />extinguished. He reiterated that he would like to keep the original intent in place that <br />this not be allowed to become a traffic road for the future homes to be built, but remain <br />a single driveway access to the home. He added that the easement can eventually be <br />extinguished because a new 40-foot wide frontage will be installed on Cindy Way. <br /> <br />With respect to the new home, Mr. Jansen stated that the home is being relocated to set <br />the stage for the future development. He noted that this will be green building to the <br />fullest extent since he will be retaining the home and not be dumping materials in the <br />landfill. He explained that the home will be re-wrapped with all new siding, trim, <br />windows, paint, and gutter to match the existing Roselyn Estates home and provide <br />good continuity. He added that he has also obtained unanimous Homeowners <br />Association (HOA) support for the relocated home. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce asked Mr. Jansen what kind of outreach he has done with the <br />neighbors. <br /> <br />Mr. Jansen replied that at this stage, he has brought information to the HOA Board of <br />Directors on the relocation of the , which is the only current thing now <br />affecting the HOA. With respect to future development, he indicated that the outreach <br />will be extensive in that the draft and future plans will be presented to the HOA and to <br />residents of Calico Lane and other neighbors off of Rose Avenue. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce verified with Mr. Jansen that he has plans to talk to the neighbors <br />on Cindy Way and Calico Lane regarding what is going on with the future development. <br /> <br />Mr. Jansen said yes. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank moved to find that the rezoning is consistent with the <br />General Plan and will not have a significant effect on the environment, and to <br />recommend approval to the City Council of the Negative Declaration and <br />Case PRZ-59; to approve PDR-965, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A-1 <br />of the staff report; and to approve the modification of Condition No. 24 of <br />PTR-7534, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A-2 of the staff report. <br />Commissioner Pentin seconded the motion. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 8, 2011 Page 5 of 22 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.