My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 060811
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 060811
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
7/18/2011 3:24:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/8/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Commission that the CC&Rs, Exhibit D of the staff report, is the same as what <br />Mr. Studzinski earlier distributed to the Commissioners. <br /> <br />Mr. Studzinski stated that the staff report he received from the City does not include the <br />CC&Rs. He noted that it shows the Neighborhood and Support Commercial Uses, with <br />Nreference to the ARB. <br /> <br />Ms. Amos clarified that Mr. Studzinski is looking at a separate attachment and that it <br />appears that he did not have Attachment D, which is the CC&Rs, which is 85 pages <br />long. She explained that she was simply clarifying that the Commission received a copy <br />of the CC&Rs. <br /> <br />Mr. Studzinski stated that he was just going with what he received, which has Exhibit E <br />following Exhibit C. He questioned why he does not get to see a copy of Exhibit D. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank and Chair Narum assured Mr. Studzinski that the Commissioners <br />received a copy of the CC&Rs. <br /> <br />Thomas Stone, President of VBP and a member of the ARB, stated that he has been on <br />the Board for over ten years and has been the President for three years. He indicated <br />that he owns two units in VBP. He then reviewed the VBP process, noting that the use <br />must go through the ARB first, and if approved, goes to the City for Use Permit <br />approval. He added that if the City approves the application but the ARB denies it, the <br />only recourse the Board has is to call the business in to a VBP Board Meeting and ask <br />the business owner to cease and desist the operation of the business, and if the <br />business owner refuses, the next order is to obtain an injunction and start daily fines. <br /> <br />Mr. Stone stated that he understands people have legitimate businesses, but there are <br />problems in VBP with past Boards and review boards allowing children-based <br />businesses to operate, which has created a hazard. He noted that UPS and FedEx <br />drivers pass through the back side of the building, and they are not looking for kids. He <br />also noted that parents drop off their children at any place in the parking lot to attend <br />their piano or dance classes, and there have been near accidents with children getting <br />hit. He indicated that this is the basi <br />children in a Light Industrial business park. <br /> <br />Chair Narum inquired, if there is a concern with children activities, if the Board has <br />discussed filing a modification to the PUD to remove these activities from the list as <br />conditionally approved uses. <br /> <br />Mr. Stone replied that they have discussed this matter with the VBP attorney who looks <br />out for the interest of the VBP owners. He noted that it would involve a lot of work, <br />would cost a lot of money to rewrite anything in the CC&Rs, and would require a <br />majority vote of all business owners in the Park. He pointed out that it would be a bit <br />easier with the ARB having the final say and implementing its decision, and hope that <br />the City works with them. He noted that they have been dealing with the City for the <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 8, 2011 Page 11 of 22 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.