My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 051111
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 051111
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
7/18/2011 3:21:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/11/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
he would like to see the delta between what the sites have been zoned or planned for <br />and what could be. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan stated that this is useful information for both the Planning Commission and <br />the City Council to consider; however, he was not certain as to whether or not this is <br />within the context of the EIR. He indicated that in some cases, massing on a particular <br />site can create an adverse environmental impact, but sometimes it does not. He <br />thanked the Commission for requesting this kind of analysis and added that if it does not <br />end up in EIR, staff will do some work on it. <br /> <br /> reason he brought up this issue of comparing <br />current zoning versus residential rezoning, which he thinks is important, is not <br />necessarily how it affects the EIR as that will be covered when how the residential units <br />affects the environment is addressed. He indicated that at the last Planning <br />Commission meeting, there were many residents who were very focused on the site <br />near their neighborhood, especially those on the east side, Sites 8, 11, and 14, who <br />were very concerned about putting so many units in one area. He noted that if these <br />people see and understand that if, based on its current zoning, a business park were <br />built in the area, the impacts might be much worse, then they might be less concerned <br />over having high-density residential in the area. He added that although this does not <br />have a direct impact on the EIR, it would be a nice piece of information to have as it has <br />a lot to do with what the folks feel about. <br /> <br />Chair Narum ed <br />it this is an option in this case. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan o Project alternative is required by CEQA. <br /> <br />Chair Narum inquire if this is still the case even if the City if under court order to do this. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan replied that it is just an analytical tool and not a possible outcome. <br /> <br />Chair Narum inquired if different components of some of the sites will be considered in <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan replied that staff already started considering and will try to extract from public <br />dialogue what would make sense. He indicated that there may be mixes and matches <br />that respond to a stream of comments that can be pulled out and be an alternative. He <br />noted that the issue about with and without the connection to El Charro Road could <br />also be an alternative and would provide very useful information to decision-makers. <br />He added that there are also some sites where there is at least an ongoing dialogue <br />regarding accommodating a higher number, which could also be an alternative. <br /> <br />Chair Narum inquired if one of these sites is the Auf der Maur property on Stanley <br />Boulevard. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 11, 2011 Page 15 of 17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.