My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 051111
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 051111
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
7/18/2011 3:21:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/11/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Dolan advised that staff would consider this suggestion like it would every comment <br />made tonight. He cautioned that because someone made a comment does not <br />necessarily mean it will be done. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank clarified that he wanted to know if staff is interested to hear if all <br />five Commissioners think it should be included in the scope of the EIR. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan replied that it would be helpful to staff to know if this was the thinking of a <br />majority of the Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank moved to include the property at 4202 Stanley Boulevard in <br />the scope of the EIR. <br />Commissioner <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson indicated that he would like the record to reflect that the reason he <br />took his position relative to this property is because the City has a developer that wants <br />to engage, and he thinks this is important to ultimately bring housing units into the City. <br />He added that he also agrees with Commissioner Pentin it should be done within the <br />proper process. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, Pentin <br />NOES: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Recused: None <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Pearce <br /> <br />Chair Narum inquired, with respect to the question of massing raised by the speaker on <br />the Pleasanton Gateway site, if the impact of the additional housing will be assessed in <br />comparison to the office use approved for the site. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan replied that staff has not really had the chance to completely consider this but <br />that he is certain that in some way, the assessment will acknowledge and will be <br />compared to what could be there and what is approved. He added that there will also <br />be some information about what kind of massing would result from this rezoning, <br />independent of the existing approval. <br /> <br />rezoned in the same way, i.e., considering the delta between the current zoning and the <br />rezoning. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan replied that those types of issues will be evaluated; however, staff has not yet <br />determined the precise methodology on how they will be evaluated. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pentin stated that for the Pleasanton Gateway site and any other sites <br />that have the same situation where something has already been planned or approved, <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 11, 2011 Page 14 of 17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.