Laserfiche WebLink
like to see less than ten acres and less than 30 units per acres, and more single-family <br />homes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pentin stated that he cannot see it being removed from the list. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson indicated that he would maintain his original position to remove it <br />from the list. <br /> <br />Commissioners Pearce and Pentin and Chair Narum support keeping this site on <br />the list. <br />modification that the density of 30 units per acre and ten acres for multi-family be <br />reduced, and the number of single-family homes be increased. <br />Commissioner Olson supports removing this site from the list. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson noted that the description for Site 7 includes professional offices. <br /> <br />Chair Narum stated that that is the General Plan designation. <br /> <br />Ms. Stern advised that , prior to closing the door for <br />the CEQA analysis, to indicate if there are any other sites it would like to include. <br /> <br />Chair Narum noted that there is the site on Sunol Boulevard that was originally on the <br />list and was then removed. She added that the Commission had approved the site for <br />an office building. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired if this was the site whose owner staff was unable to <br />contact. <br /> <br />Ms. Stern said yes and added that staff could make another effort to contact the owner. <br />She noted that there were two sites in the area: one at Sonoma Drive which is a small <br />piece where the industrial/business park area is; and the second is south of that site on <br />Sycamore Road, half of which is planned for a memory care proposal. She added that <br />both sites are pretty small at one to two acres. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce referred back to Site 6; Irby-Kaplan-Zia, and indicated that while <br />she is in support of housing on that site, she is not necessarily in favor of demolishing <br />an older, existing house on the site. <br /> <br />Chair Narum noted that this house was discussed at length at the last Task Force <br />meeting which Commissioner Pearce missed, and the comment was that it was the ice <br />house that was worth saving. She indicated that the point was that there were existing <br />structures that needed to be reviewed. <br /> <br />Chair Narum indicated that the Commission has completed its discussion on the sites. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, April 27, 2011 Page 34 of 40 <br /> <br />