My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 042711
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 042711
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
7/18/2011 3:20:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/27/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Commissioner Olson noted that he read a comment made at the community workshop <br />in March that school impact fees are lower for multi-family development than they are <br />for single-family homes. He inquired why this is the case. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan replied that it is correct that the generation of children per unit is less for a <br />multi-family project and that the multiplier used is at a lower rate. He stated that the <br />School District will have to accommodate growth throughout the City. He noted that <br />some of the schools have more children in them than others, and as part of the <br />demographic study, many of the schools are projected over the next ten years to have <br />less students than they do now. He stated that the last demographic study did not <br />anticipate the loss of the housing cap, but the District definitely has a challenge since <br />even with the cap in some schools, the District projected that it will need a new <br />elementary school by 2019. He indicated that the Council just had a joint session with <br />the School District at which it was acknowledged that the next demographic study the <br />District is planning on doing is going to be different as there will be more housing units <br />and the District will have to plan to accommodate them. <br /> <br />The Commission then proceeded to discuss each of the sites. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pentin commented that each of the properties is unique, citing the <br />Goodnight Inn for one, and the BART property which has a buy-in by BART to effect <br />development. He asked the two Commission Task Force members if the Stoneridge <br />Shopping Center is willing to go in this direction with its seven acres. <br /> <br />Chair Narum stated the Task Force was given an indication by a property owner or a <br />representative of the property owner that they would be interested in being rezoned. <br />She added that the Task Force, in fact, removed from the list any sites that the property <br />owners did not want rezoned because it did not feel comfortable with considering them, <br />and the Task Force is not interested in eminent domain. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce added that the Task Force looks for feasibility, and there is little <br />of that if the property owners say they are not interested in rezoning. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson comment <br />82.5 acres. He <br />stated that as the Commission goes down the list of the sites, he would simple indicate <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan stated that the Commission can forward its input to the Task Force in any <br />form it wants, including individual comments like the Task Force did. He indicated that <br />n to the Task Force based on the work <br />done to date. He noted that this will eventually return to the Commission as a finished <br />product prepared by the Task Force with the help of staff as part of the General Plan, <br />and the Commission will vote on it and forward its recommendation to the City Council. <br />He noted that tonight would be the end of the Commission input, and it will return <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, April 27, 2011 Page 24 of 40 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.