My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 042711
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 042711
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
7/18/2011 3:20:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/27/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Dolan stated that he does not think the information presented was directly related to <br />the amount of high density but rather to how many of these homes have a legal <br />restriction that limits the amount of rent that can be paid. He noted that there are about <br />1,000 of these units throughout the City, and staff double checked the numbers and <br />arrived at 39 percent as opposed to 40 percent. He indicated that one thing to <br />remember is that over one-half of these are senior units, which have senior restrictions <br />and demand a different kind of service. He noted that these units do not have the kind <br />of impacts on neighborhoods that regular housing does in that they have a reduced <br />numbers of trips and have no school impacts. <br /> <br />stated that, for the sake of planning this out, he would assume <br />that these units would comprise 15 percent of the density that are built because there <br />would not be a lot of full development at lower cost. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan replied that he sees it very difficult for developers of affordable housing to <br />come in and acquire any of this land, and it would be a unique situation if one does <br />acquire it. He added that in this case, if the developer brings such a project in, the City <br />will consider it and process it. <br /> <br />inquired if the City has numbers on what the distribution would <br />look like at build-out with the assumption that 15 percent of what is built out is going to <br />be in the lower-income range. He further inquired what it would look without counting <br />senior housing. <br /> <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that the City does not have that information, and staff does not know <br />what percentage of these will be senior units; however, there is language in the <br />Settlement Agreement that the City should be making efforts to address families. He <br />indicated that the City has an abundance of senior housing that is income-restricted. <br />He noted that that is where a lot of effort has been in the past because they do have <br />fewer impacts on the neighborhood, and the City has been successful in entertaining <br />those without a lot of neighborhood disturbance. He stated, however, that the City will <br />have to shift its focus somewhat, and it does not mean that all of them will have to be <br />done this way, but they have to accommodate families who need them; there is a need <br />for both types. <br /> <br />In terms of the exact numbers, Mr. Dolan stated that he was not sure on what sites the <br />houses will end up or who will develop. He indicated that one thing that was shared <br />with the public at the workshops is that the likelihood of all of the sites actually being <br />developed is pretty low. He noted that there are a few properties that developers have <br />a hold of at this point and are showing specific interest; this is their business and they <br />are likely to move forward. He added that there are others who are more passive <br />owners, and it is difficult to say whether they will sell their properties to people who are <br />serious about developing. He stated that it is quite possible that a number of the sites <br />will still be available at the time the next Housing Element is done. He noted that if <br />2,000 units are being built and 15 percent of them are going to be income-restricted, <br />this would amount to an additional 300 affordable units. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, April 27, 2011 Page 23 of 40 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.