My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 042711
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 042711
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
7/18/2011 3:20:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/27/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Patel stated that there is no question that many concerns and perspectives have <br />been considered so far in this process; however, she and her community feel that one <br />very important concern has not been fully addressed. She indicated that it appears that <br />in the attempt to determine where to add new affordable housing, the City has not taken <br />a step back to really look at where affordable housing already exists in town. She noted <br />that this is a very important step because in order to determine where to add new <br />affordable housing, the City needs to make sure there is not already high concentrations <br />of affordable housing in those areas since adding new affordable housing in those areas <br />will only exacerbate the problem. <br /> <br />Ms. Patel stated that they did some research to determine where affordable housing <br />already exists and 22 square miles, there are currently <br />768 existing affordable housing units, 40 percent of which are within one-half mile of <br />Site 7. She indicated that she is certain the Commission can understand why they feel <br />so strongly that the Commission should not consider adding a single additional unit of <br />affordable housing in an area that already carries such a high concentration of <br />affordable housing. She added that they did more analysis and found that no other site <br />in the City has anywhere near this high concentration, and as such, this problem is <br />unique to Site 7. <br /> <br />Ms. Patel stated that given this information, it is very evident that it would be a bad <br />decision to add more affordable housing in Site 7. She added that this would be a <br /> as detailed in the General Plan: <br />Pleasanton is a well planned, balanced community with desirable neighborhoods. She <br />noted that there is no way this vision statement can be made a reality if more affordable <br />housing units are added in an area that already carries 40 percent <br />affordable housing units, and the reality will be that the City has knowingly created an <br />ill-planned, unbalanced community with an undesirable neighborhood. <br /> <br />Ms. Patel stated that at this point, they feel they still have a way to rectify the situation. <br />She indicated that there are currently 100 acres being evaluated, and only 70 acres <br />need to be sent to the State. She respectfully and firmly asked the Commission that, <br />given this information, Site 7 be taken off of the consideration list. She then gave the <br />Commission a handout with information that corroborates their numbers. <br /> <br />Chris Buescher stated that who spoke earlier regarding <br />Site 12 <br />. He indicated that most people talked about their neighborhood and how they <br />would be impacted, but he is taking a different viewpoint: how it impacts the actual <br />low-income families and the reasons why Site 12 would not be a good site for them to <br />live in. <br /> <br />Mr. Buescher noted that access to and from the site on Santa Rita Road is extremely <br />dangerous as Santa Rita Road is one of the busiest streets in the area. He stated that <br />based on one of the comments made that exit from the site will be through Valley <br />Avenue, he drove from the site down to Valley Avenue. He indicated that people will <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, April 27, 2011 Page 14 of 40 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.