My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 042711
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 042711
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
7/18/2011 3:20:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/27/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
impacts on safety, <br /> negative impact on property values, <br /> increased crime, <br /> disagreement in the way the City used the rating criteria, <br /> distance to schools and grocery stores, <br /> impacts on schools; overcrowded schools, <br /> inappropriate to put development in an established residential <br />neighborhood, <br /> soils issues, settlement issues in the area, <br /> overloaded sewer, and <br /> noise and air quality impacts <br /> <br />This site has been struck out on the sites map. Following the three community <br />workshops and before the Task Force March meeting, staff re-visited some of the <br />scoring on the sites, particularly those relating to Valley Trails in terms of some of <br />the distances. Because this is a site that has a loop road, looking at radii is really <br />a misinterpretation of some of the distances to schools, parks, and grocery <br />stores. This site was already scored low among all 17 sites, and re-scoring <br />brought it down by four more points. A second straw vote took the site out of <br />consideration by the Task Force. <br /> <br />Site 16: Vintage Hills Shopping Center <br /> <br /> This site is located on Bernal Avenue near Touriga Drive and Vineyard Avenue <br />and has been recently rehabilitated and is now getting a few more retail tenants. <br /> <br /> Four comments were initially received, and since the summary was produced, a <br />number of people from the neighborhood commented and sent emails: <br /> this site started getting commercial tenants and revitalizing; this is not the <br />time to look at multi-family development there, <br /> its surrounding residents have been hard hit with reduced home values <br /> they already have high-density housing nearby, <br /> no BART or other transit and poor freeway access, <br /> overcrowded schools, and <br /> they were not in favor of it. <br /> <br />Site 17: Axis Community Health <br /> <br /> This is a very small Downtown site where Axis Community Health is currently <br />located. They are growing out of the site and looking for another site. They asked <br />the City to put them on the list for consideration. <br /> <br /> Only one comment was received which related to overcrowded schools. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, April 27, 2011 Page 11 of 40 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.