PC 032311 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Stern summarized that the Commission would like the applicant to provide more details about the architecture and photo simulations viewed from a number of perspectives. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE- OPENED. Mr. Huff stated that it was good to have the discussion with the Commission and that they will provide a photo montage of the building from the various streets. He indicated that they will work with staff with respect to whether or not they will have all the parking spaces on the east side, which might give them the opportunity to move the building up towards Spring Street. He added that he would address the concerns about Ray Street. Mr. Huff stated that they will maintain the three stories to accommodate Mr. Kearns' needs and that they will work with staff to look at ways to mitigate the height and the design. Mr. Kearns reiterated that he needs to provide for his business, he needs a third story to have living space, and he needs the garage space. He stated that taking one level out would turn the building into a two - bedroom apartment and that it would be very difficult to look forward. He indicated that he will work at mitigating the height and do whatever he can to make the Commission happy with the project. No action was taken. Chair Narum called for a break at 8:07 p.m. Thereafter, the Commission reconvened the regular meeting at 8:15 p.m. b. PADR -2163, C.S. Pangali Application for Administrative Design Review approval to retain an approximately 150 - square -foot second -floor loft addition within the vaulted ceiling area above the dining room and to relocate an existing second -floor window on the east (right) elevation of the existing residence located at 6333 Paseo Santa Maria. Zoning for the property is PUD -MDR (Planned Unit Development — Medium Density Residential) District. Janice Stern presented the staff report and described the scope, layout, and key elements of the proposal. Ms. Stern indicated that staff has conditioned the project to have the applicant install a non - operable second -story window with view - obscuring glass, to be covered by a restrictive covenant against the property to ensure that it is maintained as long as loft remains. She noted, however, that the applicant would like to revise that condition by installing a clear glass window instead and landscaping on his side of fence, the type and amount to be determined by the Director of Community Development, still covered by the restrictive covenant. Ms. Stern continued that just PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 23, 2011 Page 13 of 21