PC 032311 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Blank stated that this is an architectural decision and that he cannot provide an opinion or make a decision on a variance until he sees what the design would actually look like. 5. Is the proposed size of the residential unit acceptable? Commissioner Pentin stated that he thinks the proposed size of the unit goes back to what the mass is. He noted that the size of the residence is what the applicant needs, and he does not have a problem with that. He indicated that looking in from the outside, his concern is what the massing looks like and how it would impact the neighborhood. Commissioner Blank agreed and stated that he was not concerned about the size of the residence as long as the massing is under control. 6. Should the proposed setbacks be increased? Commissioner Blank stated that the setbacks, just like the massing and compatibility with other structures would depend on the project details and visuals. Commissioner Olson stated that he thinks 1,752 square feet is very reasonable and not outlandish. 7. Is the proposed building compatible with adjacent structures? Commissioner Pentin noted that the structure is situated that far off of Spring Street and is a stand - alone, and that he is fine with it if the neighbors are; however, he wanted to see details of the design first. The Commissioners concurred. 8. Does it appear too tall or massive from adjoining properties or adjacent streets? The Commissioners agreed that they need to see the detailed design before they can answer this question. Commissioner Pearce stated that she appreciated the story poles because they provided a basis for this conversation. Chair Narum expressed concern that it was too tall and too close to Ray St. Commissioner Blank thanked the owner and the applicant for installing the story poles as it took great effort on their part and was helpful to the Commission. Chair Narum asked staff if sufficient direction has been provided. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 23, 2011 Page 12 of 21