Laserfiche WebLink
in accordance with the terms of said petition. <br /> <br /> 4. i~ is n~.eoy found, determined and ordered that MacLAY & <br />SO~,.~, regzs~erem civil engineers, shall be Engineer of Work in accor- <br />dance with the terms and conditions of the petition hereinabove referred <br />to, and contract to be hereinafter entered into between the said NaoKAY <br />& SOMPS and the City of Pleasanton. It is hereby further agreed that <br />STURGIS, D~N-DULK, DOUGLASS & ANDERSON, Attorneys at Law, shall be <br />Special Bond Counsel to prepare all proceedings in accordance with the <br />terms and conaitmons of the petition nere_nabove referred to, and <br />contract to be hereafter entered into between the said STURGiS, DEN- <br />DULK, DOUGLASS & ANDERSON and the City of Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> 5. That the public interest and convenience will be served by <br />the taking of special assessment proceedings for the acquisition of im- <br />provements set forth in said petition. Said work is of more than or- <br />amna. y public benefit and the cost and expenses thereof should be <br />borne by a district benefited by said acquisition of improvements. <br />Said district shall be known and designated as '~Assessment District <br />No. 64-1, City of Pleasanton, County of Alameda, State of California". <br /> <br /> 6. The district which shall bear the cost and expenses of <br /> <br />said acquisition of improvements, including all incidental expenses, <br />and which is to be assessed to pay for the cost of said acquisition <br />of improvements, is that district shown on a map which is on file in <br />the office of the City Clerk of the City of Pleasanton, which is desig- <br />nated, "Map ~nowing Boundaries of District Proposed to be Assessed <br />for Construction of Improvements in Assessment District No. 6~-1, <br /> <br />Mission Park Assessment District No. <br /> <br />Alameda, State of California". <br /> <br /> 7. That in view of the fact <br /> <br />City of Pleasanton, County of <br /> <br />that 100% of the owners of the <br /> <br />proper~y within the area to be assessed for the cost of said acquisi- <br />tion of improvements have petitioned for said improvements, this <br /> <br />City Council hereby finds that the public interest and convenience <br />require that this City Comncil undertake proceedings for the acquisi- <br />tion of improvements under the provisions of the Municipal Improvement <br />Act of 1913 and the improvement Bond Act of 1915, and without further <br />compliance with the provisions of the Special Assessment Investiga- <br />tion, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 of the State of <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br /> <br />