Laserfiche WebLink
would be provided with both Calico Lane and the proposed Street B of the Roselyn Lane <br /> project." (Staff note: Street B is now Lynn Drive, the street along the Arroyo Del Valle.) <br /> At that time, it was believed that the when the Jones property is ready for development, the <br /> existing home would then be demolished and the access easement would no longer be <br /> required. The plan to develop the property has since changed. The proposal is to retain the <br /> existing home and thus, to allow it to continue to use the existing 20-foot access easement. <br /> o <br /> wre <br /> Subject driveway • <br /> Location of the Existing Driveway to 1623 Cindy Way <br /> Staff found that the request .s reasonable and supportable as it would maintain a single- <br /> family use of this driveway. Staff recommends that this condition be modified to read as <br /> follows (new text is in bold underline): <br /> The existing 20-foot easement located on the westerly boundary of APN 946-3477- <br /> 002 shall be extinguished, unless otherwise agreed to by the City Attorney and City <br /> Engineer, and shall also establish a new 20-foot easement between Lots 8 and 9 <br /> located contiguous to the northerly boundary of Lot 9 for the benefit of the Jones <br /> property for access to that property, prior to final map recordation. This easement <br /> shall be an exclusive easement for the purposes of ingress and egress for the <br /> benefit of the existing Jones residence and provide for a non-exclusive easement for <br /> the purposes of underground utilities, including, but not limited to, storm drainage, <br /> sanitary sewer, water, cable TV, telephone, etc. or as approved by the City Engineer <br /> and City Attorney. In the event that the Jones property is developed, the exclusive <br /> access easement will be required to be extinguished unless it is allowed to remain <br /> by the City Attorney and City Engineer. <br /> As part of the continued use of the driveway, this driveway location would be adjusted. The <br /> south portion of the driveway abuts the north property line of Lot 9, and that property line is <br /> not a straight line. There is a jog in the line. The applicant wishes to take this opportunity to <br /> Case No. PUD-38-03M Planning Commission <br /> Page - 10- <br />