My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
071911
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2011 3:29:06 PM
Creation date
7/12/2011 3:29:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o E <br /> -,Lo ilk - 1.� i. <br /> m E R9A3 ®E®®® <br /> g <br /> �7I If1�T�1� •• <br /> DD i° Tl ` = 1L1 �MI — _ <br /> ' .uIFYn`.. _ _ nan AI 4,SIelevation <br /> Noposed RoCindy s l-o[9 6 -..,.-... <br /> 1619 Cindy Wily_ <br /> — 1I_ <br /> •n;rr� n. : =n , ;�_ <br /> men' <br /> - n lllllllf <br /> en n ttt r an W. <br /> i mill mil iE :u Iu 11:- -ISO -- - - <br /> ren Al RIsH7 eleve[lon _ <br /> ren AT REAR elevetfan <br /> The selected home design for Lot 9 was part of the pre-approved designs for Roselyn <br /> Estates. As Lot 9 is part the development, it is appropriate to use one of the pre-approved <br /> models for this lot. Staff finds that using a reserved plan is sensible to create a more <br /> appealing streetscape within the development. <br /> 3) Continued Use of the Existing Driveway to 1623 Cindy Way. <br /> Condition of Approval No. 24 of Tract 7534 states: <br /> The existing 20-foot easement located on the westerly boundary of APN 946-3477- <br /> 002 shall be extinguished, unless otherwise agreed to by the City Attorney and City <br /> Engineer, and shall also establish a new 20-foot easement between Lots 8 and 9 <br /> located contiguous to the northerly boundary of Lot 9 for the benefit of the Jones <br /> property for access to that property, prior to final map recordation. This easement <br /> shall be an exclusive easement for the purposes of ingress and egress for the <br /> benefit of the existing Jones residence and provide for a non-exclusive easement for <br /> the purposes of underground utilities, including, but not limited to, storm drainage, <br /> sanitary sewer, water, cable TV, telephone, etc. or as approved by the City Engineer <br /> and City Attorney. In the event that the Jones property is developed, the exclusive <br /> access easement will be required to be extinguished. <br /> The staff report for PUD-38 stated that "Mr. David Jones has suggested that the proposed <br /> 20-foot access easement is inadequate and should be designed as a standard residential <br /> road section to accommodate and serve as the primary entrance to the Jones'property <br /> should the family wish to subdivide. City staff discussed this as an alternative and <br /> determined that it would not be desirable to have this as a standard street which would cut <br /> through the Roselyn Lane project area. Should the Jones family wish to subdivide, access <br /> Case No. PUD-38-03M Planning Commission <br /> Page - 9 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.