My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
060711
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2011 5:13:09 PM
Creation date
6/1/2011 5:00:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/7/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The IVS allocates approximately 6,550 more housing units to Pleasanton than <br />assumed in the Pleasanton General Plan. However, it assumes only <br />3,312 (approximately) more units than will be assumed in the General Plan when <br />the current Housing Element is adopted, and the timeframe for the IVS is 10 years <br />longer than the General Plan. <br />Table 2: Pleasanton General Plan and Initial Vision Scenario <br />Document <br />Housing <br />Units <br />2007 or 2010 <br />Housing <br />Units <br />2025 or 2035 <br />Housing <br />Unit <br />Growth <br />Jobs <br />2010 <br />Jobs <br />2025 or 2035 <br />Job <br />Growth <br />2010 -2035 <br />Pleasanton <br />General <br />Plan <br />25,765 <br />(year 2007) <br />= 29,000 <br />(year 2025) <br />= 3,235 <br />64,260* <br />(year 2010) <br />76,020* <br />(year 2025) <br />81,270* <br />(year 2035) <br />70,158 <br />(year 2035) <br />17,010 <br />17,383 <br />ABAG & <br />MTC —IVS <br />24,034 <br />(year 2010) <br />33,819 <br />(year 2035) <br />9,785 <br />52,775 <br />(year 2010) <br />Note: *According to the Pleasanton General Plan, this projection based on ABAG's Projections 2007. <br />IVS Modeling <br />Information regarding ABAG's modeling is in Attachment 1. According to ABAG, the <br />current IVS forecast does not take into account many factors that constrain the region's <br />supply of new housing units, such as limitations in supporting infrastructure, affordable <br />housing subsidies, and current market factors. According to ABAG, the IVS is largely <br />designed around places for growth identified previously by local jurisdictions. These <br />places are defined by their character, scale, density, and the expected housing units to <br />be built over the long term. Using "place types," areas with similar characteristics and <br />physical and social qualities, ABAG asked local governments to identify general <br />development aspirations for areas within their jurisdictions. These places were mostly <br />the PDAs already identified through the FOCUS program (such as Hacienda Business <br />Park, which is a potential PDA). They also included additional Growth Opportunity <br />Areas (GOAs), some similar to PDAs and others with different sustainability criteria. <br />IVS Measured Against Performance Targets <br />The IVS results in a 12 percent per capita greenhouse gas emissions reduction from <br />personal -use vehicles in 2035, compared to a 2005 base year. This reduction falls <br />short of the region's state - mandated 15 percent per capita greenhouse gas emissions <br />reduction target. <br />MTC and ABAG adopted a set of Plan Bay Area performance targets to describe in <br />specific, measureable terms the regions' commitment and progress toward the three "E" <br />principles of sustainability (Economy, Environment, and Equity). According to ABAG <br />and MTC, the IVS meets several regional targets, including: accommodating all <br />projected housing need by income level; reducing the financial burden of housing and <br />transportation on low- income households by providing more affordable housing; and <br />housing the majority of new development within existing urban cores, much of which is <br />located close to services, amenities, jobs, and transit. <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.