My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
051711
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2011 11:28:09 AM
Creation date
5/12/2011 11:28:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/17/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
you have to provide enough land to accept your regional fair share of housing, which sometimes you <br /> don't have that and can't accomplish providing the land within the required timeline. The City didn't <br /> zone enough and couldn't keep the promise of the program to look at additional properties within <br /> Hacienda and didn't meet our timeline. It became a problem for a group of housing advocates, which <br /> is known as Urban Habitat and filed a lawsuit against the City in 2006, which wasn't resolved until <br /> 2010. He shared how the lawsuit alleged how the City hadn't done the rezoning which was true and it <br /> invalidated the City's housing cap and concluded that our housing cap that set a limit on the <br /> residential development in our town to 29,000 housing units was inconsistent with state law. After four <br /> years of litigation, the City did lose the case and their housing cap, but negotiated the ability to <br /> undertake a Task Force process for Hacienda Rezonings. This took nine months with the 21 member <br /> task force which was broadly represented, which came to some common ground and made a <br /> recommendation for an adoption of TOD (Transit-Oriented Development) Standards and Design <br /> Guidelines which were adopted on March 1, 2011. Referenced and summarized the three Hacienda <br /> Sites on a map that totaled 29 acres, which could house 30-55 units per acres (870 to 1,575 homes). <br /> This development could generate 654 school-aged children, but more like approximately 500 children <br /> or less because of the economy and the housing market. With the current boundaries that are in <br /> place, these children would attend Donlon Elementary, Hart Middle School and Foothill High School. <br /> Trustee Hintzke asked the size of the dwellings in this development. Mr. Dolan responded that they <br /> have not been proposed. but stated that they could have some studio units in them, and a <br /> requirement of at least three bedrooms in a portion of them. The vast majority will be one and two <br /> bedrooms. <br /> Trustee Grant noted that similar projects were looked at in surrounding communities and the <br /> occupancy of families and kids in order to come up with the 500-654 numbers. Mr. Dolan stated that <br /> they relied on the demographers study to relate to the estimate of students. <br /> Vice Mayor Cook-Kallio asked if the 500 was a net gain or was this what the area will generate. What <br /> will the gain be elsewhere in the City. Mr. Dolan responded that it was only the sites. PUSD's last <br /> demographers report showed a growth in elementary. Mr. Dolan continued to share that they gave <br /> them a number of 920 units and they included that estimate of units in this particular area and the <br /> report recommended that by year 2020, PUSD would need a new elementary school. Superintendent <br /> Ahmadi noted that an updated demographers report and a facilities master plan would be brought to <br /> the board in May as the last one that was created was in 1996. <br /> Mr. Dolan reviewed the housing elementary required rezonings and noted that the state issues <br /> numbers that are assigned to regions every eight years or so, is distributed to the county and then to <br /> the city level. He noted that they are obligated to provide an additional 50 acres zoned at 30 units per <br /> acre and an additional 15 acres at approximately 25 units per acre. The requirement for 30 is set, in <br /> which the state has dictated that number. He shared that they are under no obligation to build this <br /> housing on the part of the City; it's the responsibility of the private real estate market. They will bring <br /> the proposals to us for review, but we don't proactively go out and build this housing. With the figures <br /> mentioned above, that would bring in approximately 2,000 additional homes which would be <br /> approximately 820 school aged children. It will be a challenge to find this land to rezone and it's <br /> important to remember that its very unlikely there will be a mad rush to develop all of it. Some of it <br /> will happen, but right now the residential market is pretty dead. <br /> The Council appointed another Task Force to help with this process, which is smaller, but has similar <br /> broad representation with only 11 members. Their primary task is to help find the sites that we should <br /> be looking at. He reviewed the draft information regarding potential housing sites, which totaled 108 <br /> acres, 81 with 23 units and 3141 with 30 units. <br /> Trustee Laursen asked if the Legacy site is right next to the current transfer station. Mr. Dolan <br /> responded "yes". She asked if and when that parcel becomes rezoned, the transfer station is slated to <br /> move on at one point, is there a concern about timing. Mr. Dolan responded while that site rated fairly <br /> well in the criteria, it did have some negatives and that was one of them. Another concern about the <br /> Joint City Council and <br /> PUSD Board Minutes Page 2 of 7 March 28, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.