My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
050311
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2011 2:43:40 PM
Creation date
4/27/2011 12:47:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/3/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> In November 2004, the City issued the City of Pleasanton, Water Revenue Refunding <br /> Bonds, Series 2004 (Bonds) in the amount of $3,595,000. The Bonds are payable from <br /> water revenues from ratepayers from the Water Fund. The final payment on the Bonds <br /> is September 1, 2014. The bonds require that the City set rates and collect water <br /> revenues from its customers annually that pay all maintenance and operation costs of <br /> the Water System and generate net revenues equal to 1.25% of the debt service <br /> payments (principal and interest) then due on the Bonds (Bond Covenant). The City has <br /> ample reserves to pay the annual debt service on the Bonds; however, the Bond <br /> Covenants require the monies to come from annual water revenues not existing <br /> reserves, If they are unable to come from annual revenues then water rates must be <br /> increased accordingly. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The City had not raised its water rates for ten years and during that time it had been <br /> using reserves to supplement annual operating revenues (fees and charges from water <br /> customers) to fund annual operations. Staff knew that the growth in expenditures <br /> (mainly Zone 7 water costs) was outpacing the growth in water revenues and a rate <br /> increase was necessary. However, the water rate increase that was approved by <br /> Council and implemented September 1, 2010, came too late to help the Water Fund in <br /> 2009/10FY. Therefore, the City needed to reduce the Water Fund expenditures in order <br /> to meet its Bond Covenant in the 2009/10FY. The logical candidate of expenditures to <br /> reduce was the overhead charges from the General Fund. Annually, the City charges <br /> the Water Fund and other enterprise operations an overhead charge for administrative <br /> services provided by the operating staff funded in the General Fund (i.e., payroll, City <br /> administration, engineering, City attorney's support, etc.). It should be noted that not <br /> meeting the City's Bond Covenant requires a water rate increase (which the City did <br /> implement in September 2011) and continued violation of its Bond Covenants could <br /> result in a downgrade in the City's bond rating. Once again as a result of the reduction <br /> in overhead charges the City was able to meet its bond covenant for the 2009/10FY and <br /> avoid any potential downgrade in its bond rating. <br /> To avoid this issue in the future staff is recommending that the City payoff the remaining <br /> Bonds from the Water Fund reserves. The total amount needed to payoff the Bonds is <br /> $715,916 of which $71,591 is currently on hand with the Bond Trustee. Therefore, the <br /> remaining funds needed to payoff the Bonds Is $644,325. These monies will come from <br /> the Water Fund's reserves of $6.0 million. <br /> Submitted by:�Q� Approve by: <br /> Emily Wagner Nelson Fialho <br /> Director of Finance City Manager <br /> Attachments: <br /> 1. Resolution <br /> 2. Escrow Instructions <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.