My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 020911
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 020911
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/20/2011 4:01:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/9/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Tolleson replied that it is used for parking. He noted that it is very small in spite of <br />its legal size; because of the size of the opening, the equivalent of 1.5 vehicles, or one <br />car and a motorcycle, can fit into it. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired if this was because of the restroom. <br /> <br />Mr. Tolleson replied that there is no restroom in the existing garage; the restroom is part <br />of the original sales office, which is now used as an entertainment room. He noted that <br />the owners do not want to re-convert that into a garage because they would have to <br />demolish the bathroom and lose square footage, thereby reducing the value of the <br />house. He added that they would then have a redundant garage which would further <br />reduce the square footage of the house. <br /> <br />Chair Narum inquired what would happen if the Commission required a legitimate <br />parking space alongside the new garage where the existing garage is. <br /> <br />Mr. Tolleson pointed out that the existing garage is very wide and can accommodate <br />parking for three cars. <br /> <br />Ms. Stern noted that the reason they want to move the garage is to acquire some rear <br />yard space, and adding a parking space above the proposed location of the new garage <br />would not be feasible because it would cut into the rear yard space. <br /> <br />Mr. Tolleson explained that acquiring additional rear yard space is not actually the case <br />but what is stated by staff. He stated that what is the mostly likely scenario and what <br />the owners would like is to have the option of being able to enter the home from the <br />garage when it is raining. <br /> <br />Chair Narum stated that she had a problem with the guarantee that there will be no <br />parking in the driveway. <br /> <br />Mr. Tolleson replied that this could be made a deed restriction. <br /> <br />Chair Narum indicated that as stated previously by Commissioner Pentin, this would be <br />driveway and there is a parking space alongside of it. She inquired if this would <br />alleviate the concern. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan replied that the short driveway provides another opportunity to park, and he <br />was not sure it would prohibit anybody from parking there. He noted that it would add <br />more pavement where there are already three extra parking spaces around the corner <br />that no other house has. He added that if the Commission is interested in making this <br />happen, it would make the impact slightly less. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, February 9, 2011 Page 27 of 41 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.