My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 020911
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 020911
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/20/2011 4:01:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/9/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
stated that there are some homes in the historic <br />area which are quite small at 900 square feet with small backyards, but they usually <br />have other backyards that adjoin each other. He indicated that he is more concerned <br />about a backyard that adjoins a 12 foot tall wall because it is not a usable space. <br /> <br />Chair Narum said the proposed homes are not 900-square-foot homes, but she would <br />not mind seeing the house size decrease as it would make it more affordable for a <br />young couple buying their first home. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank agreed. <br /> <br />No action was taken. <br /> <br />Chair Narum called for a break at 9:00 p.m. and thereafter reconvened the regular <br />meeting at 9:10 p.m. <br /> <br />c. PV-203, Rahul and Himani Limaye <br />Application for a Variance from the Pleasanton Municipal Code to allow <br />a garage to be set back 11 feet, 6 inches from the street-side sideyard <br />property line where a 20-foot setback is required. The property is <br />located at 4267 Churchhill Drive and is zoned R-1-6,500 (One-Family <br />Residential) District. <br /> <br />Natalie Amos presented the staff report and described the scope, layout, and key <br />elements of the project. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank referred to the plan for the proposed garage location and asked <br />Ms. Amos to point out the location of the driveway, which Ms. Amos did. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank inquired if the driveway would go right into the street, which would <br />be the safety concern. <br /> <br />Ms. Amos said yes. She indicated that the length of the driveway would be about <br />13 feet, and it is likely that only one car would be able to park on the side of the <br />driveway apron. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan indicated that this is a short apron, and staff is concerned that people will <br />always park there, and the car would extend out into the sidewalk. <br /> <br />Chair Narum inquired if the garage would have to be shifted three feet to the east if it is <br />to achieve the 18-foot long driveway. <br /> <br />Ms. Amos said yes. She added that 18 feet would be from property line to the front of <br />the garage. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, February 9, 2011 Page 22 of 41 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.