My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 020911
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 020911
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/20/2011 4:01:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/9/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Garbarino stated that she wanted to clarify for the Commission that there are <br />actually 14 older homes on Old Stanley Boulevard that are over 50 years old which are <br />in relatively good shape. She noted that there used to be more but they have been <br />demolished thoughtlessly. She added that there are other homes that have been built <br />to echo some past historic look, but they all look new. She indicated that those owners <br />are also quite concerned about the density of this project and voiced the difficulty in <br />driving slowly by the neighborhood. She noted that there are a couple of contractors in <br />the audience and inquired whether they might want to speak about how much it would <br />cost to rehabilitation the house slated for demolition. <br /> <br />Ms. Cruzan requested the Commission to consider the 15-foot setbacks on the east <br />side for the neighbors because of the fact that homes will be two stories and a ten-foot <br />setback is not very far. She cited the uniqueness of the area and invited the <br />Commissioners to visit the neighborhood. She concluded that she would appreciate <br />anything the Commission can do to preserve the home. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she thinks the discussion was very productive. She <br />agreed with Commissioner PentinCommission striving for <br />balance and while she is not opposed to the developer developing the property, she <br />would like balance in the final decision. <br /> <br />Chair Narum asked for feedback regarding the 15-foot setbacks. <br /> <br />The Commissioners felt that the new plan could address the setbacks. <br /> <br />stated that he thinks with two less units, there will be more <br />preservation of trees. He added that the entire open space does not necessarily have <br />to be one lot in the center; he would love to see either more space between units for a <br />single-family development, or alternatively, more usable space in the backyards of <br />attached homes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank commented that the first home he moved into was 1,000 square <br />feet on a tiny lot with a tiny backyard and an attached garage in front. He stated that he <br />had minimum lot lines on both sides of his property, but this was their home. He <br />commented that there does not seem to be many of these types of homes in <br />Pleasanton. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank stated that he would like to see a 10- or 11-unit development, but <br />every time a unit is removed and the lots as well as the tot lot are made bigger, the price <br />of the homes is significantly raised. He noted that they are either legally affordable <br />housing or $800,000 housing and cited the need for something well below that range so <br />that new families can afford to live in the City. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, February 9, 2011 Page 21 of 41 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.