Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Blank indicated that he could go along with not making it a requirement. <br />He indicated that he thinks 5,000 square feet on Owens Drive should be the <br />requirement and retail allowed on Parcels 2 and 3. <br />Commissioner Pentin stated this is the reason he was moving toward Live/Work and <br />that the Commission could address parcels 2 and 3. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that this is dedicated retail space. <br />Commissioner Pentin agreed, but the City could deal with Live/Work and the possibility <br />of expanding retail up to 10,000 square feet if feasible. <br />Chair Narum and Commissioner Blank disagreed with this direction. <br />Chair Narum stated that she thinks the Commission should require the 5,000 square <br />feet of retail on Owens Drive and have retail on Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 at the corner of <br />Gibraltar Drive and Hacienda Drive as allowed but not required. <br />There was consensus to require a total retail of 5,000 square feet on Owens Drive <br />and to allow, but not require, retail on Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 at the corner of <br />Gibraltar Drive and Hacienda Drive. <br />Live/Work for Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 <br />Commissioner Pentin stated that the concept of a Live/Work environment that is a rental <br />is great, but he has not seen one. He expressed concerned that Live/Work does not <br />always work and what happens then is a Live/Live with closed windows and drapes. He <br />noted that there would then be a problem with what the hardscape and softscape on the <br />front of the building would look like. He indicated that he would not want to mandate the <br />owners to put them in, but he would not want the buildings to look like large apartments. <br />Commissioner O’Connor stated that this is a design issue because of the height <br />requirements. He noted that it should be the builder’s option, as opposed to a <br />requirement, to build Live/Work and suggested that language be included to indicate <br />that it could be a Live/Live with the option to convert to Live/Work over time as feasible. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that he likes the idea of making it a builder’s option because <br />the guideline would be in place, and should the market change significantly between <br />now and the future, the developer would have the opportunity to put in Live/Live or <br />Live/Work units. <br />Commissioner O’Connor stated that if a developer chooses to build Live/Live in areas <br />designed for Live/Work, some of the design guidelines would have to be changed to <br />include softscape for Live/Live so the frontage do not look like a storefront window when <br />it is really someone’s apartment. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, January 26, 2011 Page 35 of 50 <br /> <br />