My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 012611
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 012611
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/20/2011 3:59:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/26/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O’Connor noted that of the six Commissioners, he is probably the most <br />involved in retail. He indicated that he would not put any retail on Parcel 2 or Parcel 3; <br />he believes only Parcel 1 has a good chance of being viable and only on Owens Drive. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he does not know if Parcel 3 would be developed <br />as residential and that in the mix, it could be developed as office. He continued that <br />then the City would be looking at 500 to 600 units, or 800 to 950 units at the most. He <br />indicated that it takes more than that number of units to support retail. He noted that <br />when this was originally considered a while back, there was discussion on the kind of <br />retail that could be supported by people who would live in the area, such as a dry <br />cleaner, a hair dresser, and a nail salon. He added that the Commission also felt then <br />that 1,000 units could not support a small grocery as well as a 7-Eleven store. <br />Commissioner O'Connor indicated that as a developer, he would not put retail on any of <br />the other corners. He noted that the retail at the corner of Gibraltar Drive and <br />Stoneridge Drive has struggled for years, and Stoneridge Drive is a fairly busy road. He <br />agreed with the developer to limit retail to 5,000 square feet on Owens Drive with the <br />flexibility to add at a later date. <br />Commissioner Olson agreed with Commissioner O’Connor that the Commission should <br />stay with 5,000 square feet on Owens Drive. <br />Commissioners Pentin, Blank, and Chair Narum concurred. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated she would have always liked to have seen more retail, but <br />she thinks it is incumbent upon the City not to make this economically infeasible, and <br />the retail aspect appears to be so. She reluctantly concurred with her fellow <br />Commissioners. <br />Commissioner Pentin asked to discuss Live/Work in connection with retail. <br />Mr. Dolan indicated that he needed some clarification first. He stated that as written, <br />there is a requirement for 10,000 square feet total of retail, with a minimum of 5,000 <br />square feet on Owens Drive. He inquired if the total retail was being reduced to 5,000 <br />square feet. <br />The Commissioners said yes. <br />Mr. Dolan then asked if 5,000 square feet would be completely eliminated as an allowed <br />use or would it be at the owner’s option at the locations designated. He noted that if <br />Roche comes in five years later and is in a market where the 55 units per acre would <br />work, that would mean 12 acres without even a Starbucks. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, January 26, 2011 Page 34 of 50 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.