My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092910
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 092910
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 3:30:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/29/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, Olson, Pearce, and Pentin. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: None. <br />The Minutes of the August 25, 2010 meeting were approved, as submitted. <br />b. September 15, 2010 <br />Commissioner Pearce: <br /> Modify the sentence of the sixth full paragraph on page 15 to read as follows: <br />“Commissioner Pearce requested confirmation … less than 15 units and that, <br />therefore, in-lieu fees mustwill not be paid.” <br /> Modify the last sentence of the third paragraph on page 17 to read as follows: <br />“She added that she recognizes the need for more housing, … which, while not <br />in goodgreat condition, is still a heritage house in the City.” <br /> Modify the first and the last sentence of the fourth paragraph on page 17 to read <br />as follows: “Commissioner Pearce stated that while she did not get information <br />on the parcel size, she would have liked …. … She added that what is <br />missing…the project rises to the standard of City-approved projects.” <br /> In relation to the discussion on the Heritage Building Ordinance, Commissioner <br />Pearce stated that she does not recall discussing a draft ordinance, as noted in <br />the sixth paragraph on page 20. Additionally, she indicated that she remembers <br />that when Mr. Dolan stated he could provide a summary of the history and the <br />status of the Heritage Building Ordinance, he also mentioned that the matter <br />would be agendized for a future Planning Commission meeting. She requested <br />that this be included in the fourth paragraph on page 21. <br />Commissioner Blank: <br /> Commissioner Blank requested Commissioner O’Connor to confirm that his <br />statement in the sixth paragraph on page 10 was accurately reflected. <br /> With respect to his statement in the last paragraph on page 16 regarding project <br />phasing, Commissioner Blank stated that it was not his intent to have the City <br />codify this as restrictive. He indicated that his comment was in response to <br />Mr. Otto's statement regarding project phasing and not to Mr. Dolan's second-to- <br />last statement regarding the City's flexibility. <br /> Commissioner Blank noted that he did not make the statement in the third <br />paragraph under Selection of Housing Element Task Force participants on <br />page 22 and believed it was either Mr. Dolan or Mr. Steve. He requested that <br />this be changed accordingly. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, September 29, 2010 Page 2 of 21 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.