My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 022410
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 022410
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 3:17:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/24/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O’Connor questioned if Ponderosa Homes have other floor plans that <br />they could draw from elsewhere in the approximate square footage if they did not want <br />to repeat two of the floor plans. Ms. Hardy said they have an infinite number of floor <br />plans but feel that these floor plans are best suited for the lots and they are not <br />interested in introducing any different plan or other architectural style for these lots. <br />Ms. Hardy then indicated that unless the Commission would like her to summarize the <br />elements of the design, she would be happy to answer any questions. <br />Commissioner O’Connor inquired if, in anticipation of a lot of discussion on “custom” <br />versus “non-custom,” Ponderosa has other floor plans with the same approximate <br />square footage to draw from so as not to repeat floor plan designs. <br />Ms. Hardy replied that they had an infinite number of floor plans but that they were not <br />interested in those other floor plans as they felt these ones were good. <br />Commissioner Blank requested that the identical floor plans be put side by side so the <br />Commission can compare the elevations. <br />Ms. Hardy pointed to the elevations on display and noted that for Plan 2, they <br />re-elevated two architectural styles which would be the Prairie and the Ranch Hacienda. <br />Don Babbitt, Heartwood Communities, clarified that Terry Townsend was not the <br />co-author of the Serenity at Callippe design guidelines, noting that they are basically the <br />same guidelines as the design guidelines for the Mariposa Ranch development. He <br />added that the original conditions of approval for TTK Partnership required that the <br />application for each development had to come back to the Planning Commission. He <br />indicated that Ponderosa had contracted with Terry Townsend to review the designs <br />from an architectural standpoint. He stated that when he first brought Ponderosa <br />Homes in and met with staff, he knew they would be working off of Ponderosa’s floor <br />plans, noting that each floor plan had to have a unique elevation, which he thinks has <br />been done well, along with the conditions of approval that staff is requiring. He <br />indicated that he would be able to answer any questions regarding the history of the <br />project. <br />Commissioner O’Connor asked Mr. Babbitt what his original intent or vision was for the <br />12 lots and if he ever envisioned a production builder doing work there. <br />Mr. Babbitt replied that he spoke with some developers over the years, but the market <br />pricing was not at a point where anyone would do it. He stated that prior to Ponderosa <br />Homes, he spoke with representatives from Warmington Homes who had met with staff <br />before deciding to move on. <br />Commissioner O’Connor inquired if this was his original intent with respect to the <br />development of the 12 lots. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 24, 2010 Page 10 of 17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.