My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 012710
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 012710
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 3:16:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/27/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
b.PCUP-262, Gorman Roofing <br />Application to transfer an existing Conditional Use Permit (PCUP-189) <br />for a roof contractor business from Suite 203 to Suite 202 of the building <br />located at 1040 Serpentine Lane, in the Valley Business Park. Zoning <br />for the property is PUD-I (Planned Unit Development – Industrial) <br />District. <br />Shweta Bonn presented the staff report and described the scope and key elements of <br />the application. <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired if staff’s intent is to limit pick up and delivery hours to <br />Monday through Friday. <br />Ms. Bonn said yes. <br />Commissioner Blank inquired if the same language could be used for Condition No. 12 <br />as that of the previous application. <br />Ms. Harryman said yes. She further proposed a new Condition No. 13 because there is <br />actually a transfer of suites and suggested that the condition read as follows: “The <br />conditional use permit for Suite 203 is terminated.” <br />Chair Olson inquired if the applicant had a business license. <br />Ms. Bonn replied that the applicant had obtained a business license for his previous <br />suite and that it was upon the renewal of that business license that staff discovered that <br />the business had relocated to a new site. <br />Commissioner Blank recommended that Condition No. 13 be changed to require the <br />applicant to obtain a business license within 30 days. <br />Ms. Decker replied that staff would modify that condition. <br />Ms. Harryman indicated that she was not sue if the applicant would need a new <br />business license or would simply need to indicate that the business has relocated to a <br />new address. She added that either way, the applicant would be required to obtain a <br />business license <br />Commissioner Narum stated that she understood that when the applicant went to renew <br />his business license, staff caught the address change; if effect, the applicant had a <br />business license and when he came in to renew it, it was discovered that he had <br />relocated. <br />Ms. Bonn agreed that was the case. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 27, 2010 Page 10 of 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.