My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 120810
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 120810
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 3:01:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/8/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Stern replied that that staff has no specific information available but that the steep <br />change in grade is visible. <br />Commissioner O’Connor inquired, should the property be developed as currently zoned <br />in the General Plan with a maximum of eight units, if the developer could still receive <br />approval to build the units in the area. <br />Ms. Stern said yes. <br />Commissioner Pentin inquired if building less than ten units would not be subject to the <br />provisions of Measure PP. <br />Ms. Stern said yes, but there are other zoning and General Plan provisions. <br />Commissioner Pentin referred to the setback for the four lots fronting Foothill Road and <br />inquired if the homes on these lots would meet the required 150-foot setback after <br />widening of the road. <br />Mr. Otto replied that potentially, they would, if the houses were put back far enough. <br />Commissioner Blank referred to Exhibit B and inquired if, should the Commission <br />answer “no” to Question 1, staff would be interested in any discussion on the other <br />questions. <br />Mr. Otto replied that not all of the questions would apply, but the Commission could <br />discuss access to the lots. <br />Noting that staff cannot support access off of Santos Ranch Road, Commissioner <br />Pearce stated that on page 7 of the staff report presents two options for Parcel 3: (1) an <br />access easement across Santos Ranch Road; and (2) direct access on Foothill Road. <br />She noted that the Traffic Engineer does not support Option 2, and staff does not <br />support Option 1. <br />Ms. Stern noted that both options are problematic. <br />Commissioner Pentin inquired if Santos Ranch Road was problematic for any number of <br />units to be built. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that if the numbers of units were small enough, the Commission would <br />have to discuss the comparative benefits of building the homes with building an entirely <br />new road, its resultant scarring, tree removal, and erosion. He added that might be <br />considered if safety concerns could be minimized for a small number of lots. <br />THE PUBLIC COMMENT WAS OPENED. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, December 8, 2010 Page 6 of 23 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.