My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 120810
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 120810
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 3:01:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/8/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
truly green home and he does not see a problem with using standing seam metal under <br />the PV and water solar panels and using metal shingles on the rest of the roof. <br />Commissioner Blank added that he does not see the nexus between the Firehouse Art <br />Theater and the home as one is commercial and the other is residential. <br />Commissioner Pentin concurred with Chair Olson. He indicated that he likes what the <br />Harveys have done with their approach in building a green home and, at the same time, <br />trying to adhere to the Heritage district and achieving a balance. He noted that if the <br />proposal was for a metal seam throughout the entire roof, he would not support it; <br />however, having it only on the PV panels and hot water solar panels will not be seen by <br />the neighbors. He stated that he does not see the plan as changing the Heritage <br />district. He started that he supported the current plan proposed by Mr. Harvey and that <br />he should be applauded for the 200 green points. <br />Commissioner O’Connor referred to the comments that the standing seam metal would <br />be installed only under the PV and solar panels and that they would not be visible; <br />however, the architect and the applicant spoke about doing the entire roof where it is <br />low pitch. He asked that this be clarified. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that he would be supportive of having standing seam metal <br />for panels A and B but not under C. He reiterated that a good faith agreement was <br />made between Mr. Harvey and the neighbors.He added that a three-foot walkway may <br />have to be constructed per the Fire Code and would expect this not to be seen. <br />Mr. Dolan explained that the proposal is to install the standing seam metal roof on the <br />entire roof planes where the shingles would be located. <br />Commissioner Blank inquired if material could be put only under the PV and water solar <br />panels. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that this could be done but that it would not be practical. <br />Commissioner O’Connor agreed and noted that the area covered by the hot water solar <br />panel is a very small piece compared to the entire roof of that plane. <br />Commissioner Blank inquired what location was proposed for the non-shingle roof. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that the standing seam metal roof is proposed for all planes of <br />panels A, B and C. <br />Commissioner Blank agreed that it would not be practical to put the standing seam <br />metal only underneath the panels and reiterated that he was supportive of having them <br />only on panels A and B. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, December 8, 2010 Page 16 of 23 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.