PC 111010 - Laserfiche WebLink

building permit stage. I promised to work with you on the fencing designs for the site. 8. Please clarify condition #15 since no other lots are currently occupied are you saying I’m conditioned to repair all common landscaping for all 5 lots before my house will be given a COO? (Item 15, Comment letter, October 19, 2010). No. The berm landscaping facing Yolanda Court and Vineyard Avenue is required to be maintained by the maintenance association created for this purpose that includes the five Yolanda Court lots. Commissioner O’Connor inquired what the procedure would be if the project were approved tonight and the applicant decided to ask for a modification to the PUD; and, if that modification were to be approved and the applicant then wanted to add windows. He inquired if the applicant would be required to return for yet another approval or whether all applications would be considered at the same time as the PUD modification. Mr. Pavan replied that the modification can include the building plans and that staff would process it as a one-time approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Jeff Potts, SDG Architecture+Engineers, Project Architect, presented an overview of a revised architectural design. He indicated that in keeping with the one-story element, the dormers on the original plans were removed from the back elevation. He added that they anticipated future build-out of the attic on floor plans; they revised the corner of the house to have more of a break up which is reflective of the front elevation; and they squeezed it slightly with width by taking out one of the bedrooms downstairs in keeping with the future expansion of the attic space. He noted that the attic now goes straight across as shown in the proposed configuration of the attic and the proposed future bedroom layout. Mr. Potts stated that from a timing standpoint and in keeping with the spirit of the guidelines, the applicant would like to have his project approved without the second-floor windows on the end elevations. He added that should the applicant decide to build the attic in the future, he would return for the PUD modification, as well as for the windows, if needed. Mr. Potts stated that he is under the impression that the Park does not want people looking down into the Park. He indicated that as a planner, he has always been told “to put eyes on the Park” because it makes it safer. He noted that there is absolutely no view where the windows have been located at the two ends. He added that the windows are high up and provide the required light and ventilation; they are parallel to the Park and do not look into the Park; and the roof ridge blocks the view to the Park PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, November 10, 2010 Page 9 of 13