My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
24
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
041911
>
24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2011 11:55:20 AM
Creation date
4/13/2011 11:48:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/15/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
24
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CALL TO ORDER <br />The Public Hearing was reopened. <br />MINUTES <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR <br />Pleasanton, California <br />Small Conference Room <br />200 Old Bernal Avenue, Pleasanton <br />Wednesday, December 22, 2010 <br />The meeting was called to order at 10:30 a.m. by Janice Stern, Zoning Administrator. <br />Present: Janice Stern, Zoning Administrator; Natalie Amos, Associate Planner; <br />Mr. and Mrs. Leroudier, Applicants; Kong Susanto and Catherine Pranoto, <br />5264 Meadowwood Court; and Susan Spangler, 5253 Meadowwood Court. <br />PADR -2138 <br />Application for administrative design review approval to install a second -story window <br />on the right elevation of the e:risting residence located at 5252 Meadowwood Court. <br />Ms. Stern resumed the meeting from December 21, 2010. <br />Ms. Stern explained that she wanted to go to the site to get additional information and check on <br />conditions. <br />Ms. Spangler mentioned that her concern is the neighbor's idea of privacy and that privacy has <br />changed vastly in the last ten years. She mentioned that most people do not look into neighbor's <br />yards. She stated that people have to accept the loss of privacy. <br />Mr: Susanto stated the proposed window is much closer to their property than most neighboring <br />windows. He mentioned that putting the desk at the window would allow a person sitting at the <br />window to look into their property. He mentioned that he does not feel comfortable with the <br />proposed window looking out to that side of his property. <br />Mr. Susanto explained that the original architecture of the neighborhood respects privacy. <br />Ms. Leroudier stated that after living there five years they wanted to make improvements to their <br />home and they realized that the room needed more daylight. She asked if it was fair for them to <br />not have the window when they have the choice to use a blind to keep their privacy. <br />Mr. Leroudier asked if there was possibly a compromise as he understands the concerns of the <br />neighbors. <br />Mr. Susanto stated that there is not a compromise from the applicants. <br />PADR -2138, Leroudier December 22, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.