My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
030111
>
08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2011 2:37:08 PM
Creation date
2/24/2011 2:37:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/1/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
for the best color and luminance contrast of detectable warnings in all weather <br /> conditions and with various lighting conditions and that it clearly meets the requirements <br /> of section 4.29.2 of the ADAAG that recommend detectable warnings contrast visually <br /> with adjoining surfaces, either dark on light, or light on dark and provide a 70% contrast <br /> in light reflectance between a detectable warning and adjoining surfaces. <br /> Recent research shows the value of safety (federal) yellow being standardized for use <br /> as a warning in the pedestrian /vehicle travel way environment; that the color safety <br /> (federal) yellow is so salient even to persons having very low vision that it is highly <br /> visible even when used in association with surfaces having light reflectance values <br /> differing by as little as 40% (new, gray -white concrete). A safety (federal) yellow <br /> detectable warning surface having a 40% reflectance difference from new concrete was <br /> subjectively judged more detectable than a darker warning surface which contrasted <br /> with new concrete by 86 %. The conclusion was that the federal yellow or yellow- orange <br /> warning surfaces were preferred over other color warning surfaces. <br /> Notwithstanding the above, the ADA does not require that only yellow be used and <br /> some communities have elected to use other colors including more "earth tones" such <br /> as brick red. While this is acceptable, based on staffs research and as noted above, the <br /> non - yellow colors are not as effective for the visually impaired and therefore, they could <br /> be met with objection. As a way of addressing some residents' color concerns, staff is of <br /> the opinion that there may be certain locations where the non - yellow color could be <br /> effective. However, key to this option is assuring that there is adequate contrast with the <br /> surrounding materials (concrete and other materials) and identifying those unique <br /> community locations where the alternative color may be acceptable. The main location <br /> that seems to support the non - yellow color would be in the Downtown area where the <br /> combination of unique community setting and pavement colors would support a non - <br /> yellow color. Staff advises against non - yellow colors in major intersections or typical <br /> collector streets. If the City Council would prefer non - yellow colors where possible; staff <br /> can pursue this analysis as part of its regular construction specifications for curb cuts <br /> and truncated domes. However, as noted above, based on staff's analysis, only few <br /> locations would qualify for alternate colors. <br /> Sub ed� : / Approv by: <br /> Daniel ith Nelson Fialho <br /> Director of Operations Services City Manager <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.