My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
021511
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2011 2:22:54 PM
Creation date
2/10/2011 2:20:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
would be agreeable to all parties. Additionally, the applicants were seeking a decision <br /> from the Planning Commission the evening of the meeting. <br /> After the Planning Commission hearing, the applicants changed their mind regarding <br /> mediation. Ms. Mary Roberts, a former member of the Planning Commission, agreed to <br /> staff's request to act as the mediator and facilitated discussion for the meetings. The <br /> applicants (Mr. Rodney Lopez and Ms. Trina Lopez), two people from the "concerned <br /> neighbors" party (Mr. David Persin and Mr. Joe Perry), and staff attended the mediation <br /> meetings. Two mediation meetings were held, on Wednesday, October 6 ° , and <br /> Monday, November 22 " 2010. <br /> During the first mediation meeting, Ms. Roberts asked the two representatives from the <br /> "concerned neighbors" party what modifications would make the proposal more <br /> acceptable to them. Mr. Perry indicated that he would like the proposed second story <br /> portion of the house moved farther away from the mutual property line to reduce the <br /> view of the second story and to reduce the potential impact of shadows cast by the <br /> proposed structure. In response, Mr. Lopez indicated that the front roofline could be <br /> altered to a hipped roofline instead of the gable that is currently proposed near the <br /> corner of the home that is closest to the Perry residence. Additionally, to increase the <br /> amount of sunlight coming into the Perry residence, the Lopezes suggested that the <br /> Perrys consider installing a skylight into their front room. Also, the Lopezes offered to <br /> plant landscaping near the northeast front corner of their home to reduce the visual <br /> impact of the proposed second story as seen from the Perry's front room. The Lopezes <br /> also suggested locating the screening currently required to be planted in their rear yard <br /> to instead be planted in the rear yard of the Hoehnes, given the limited space available <br /> along their rear fence for planting. <br /> During the second mediation meeting on November 22 the above mitigation <br /> measures were further discussed. Approximations of the proposed project and views <br /> from neighboring properties were provided at the meeting to facilitate discussion and <br /> have been attached to this staff report as Attachment 5. The Lopezes offered to pay for <br /> the construction of a skylight in the front room of the Perry residence to allow for more <br /> sunlight. Additionally, the Lopezes indicated they could add a "belly- band," an <br /> architectural treatment that would extend around the perimeter of the home to assist in <br /> breaking up massing. However, Mr. Perry indicated that he does not find these <br /> measures (or the additional landscaping near the front corner of the home) to be <br /> adequate in addressing his concerns and would still like to see the second story portion <br /> of the addition be located farther from the mutual property line. Mr. Perry estimated that <br /> locating the second story farther to the west from its current location by at least 10 -feet <br /> would reduce the visual impact of the structure. Mr. Persin indicated that an addition <br /> limited to a portion of the western front half of the home would be more appropriate than <br /> the current proposal. <br /> In reply, the Lopezes indicated that they could not pull the addition back from the <br /> eastern side since it would substantially reduce the size of the two bedrooms on the <br /> second floor. The Lopezes also indicated that they considered placing some of the <br /> Page 3 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.