My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
021511
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2011 1:41:40 PM
Creation date
2/10/2011 1:41:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Proposition 4 Limit). Article XIIIB of the California Constitution limits the amount <br /> that governmental agencies can annually appropriate from proceeds of taxes. <br /> An annual calculation, factoring in population and inflation changes, is performed <br /> each year to determine the new appropriation limit. For the 2009/10FY the <br /> Proposition 4 Limit was $384,141,392 and the City received taxes subject to the <br /> Proposition 4 Limit of $68,101,459. Therefore, the City's spending of tax <br /> revenues was well within the Proposition 4 Limit. <br /> • The City of Pleasanton Auditors' Communication with Those Charged with <br /> Governance report includes the auditors' letter, addressed to the City, <br /> communicating their responsibilities in performing the audit and significant <br /> findings and issues detected during the course of the audit. The report also <br /> includes the City of Pleasanton Management Representation Letter, addressed <br /> to the auditors, communicating management's opinion of the City's financial <br /> condition, internal controls, and adherence with laws and regulations. <br /> • The City of Pleasanton Single Audit Report is the audit report required by the <br /> Single Audit Act of 1984. This report contains a schedule of Federal Financial <br /> Assistance that summarizes Federal grant activity in the City of Pleasanton for <br /> the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. <br /> • The Pleasanton Joint Powers Financing Authority Basic Financial <br /> Statements and Independent Auditors' Report is the financial report prepared <br /> by the City and audited by independent auditors to provide reasonable assurance <br /> the financial staternents are fairly presented in accordance with generally <br /> accepted accounting principles in the United States. The Pleasanton Joint <br /> Powers Financing Authority (Authority) is a blended component unit of the City; <br /> accordingly, the Authority's financial statements are also included in the basic <br /> financial statements of the City. The Authority was established in 1993 for the <br /> purpose of providing assistance to the City and the Housing Authority of the City <br /> in the financing and refinancing of public capital improvements. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The Audit Committee (Cornmittee) met on January 20, 2011 to review the 2009/10FY <br /> CAFR and related audit reports. Councilmembers Cheryl Cook- Kallio and Jerry Thorne <br /> serve on the Audit Committee along with the City Manager and the Director of Finance. <br /> The Committee discussed the audit reports and an audit adjustment that occurred <br /> subsequent to Council's acceptance on December 7, 2010, of the 2009/10FY Year -End <br /> Operating Report. In order for the City to be in compliance with its bond covenant for <br /> the 2004 Water Revenue Refunding Bonds (Bonds), the City had to reduce the <br /> 2009/10FY General Fund overhead charges to the Water Operations and Maintenance <br /> Fund (Water Fund) from $839,083 to $274,349. The City had not raised its water rates <br /> for ten years and during that time it had been using reserves to supplement annual <br /> operating revenues (fees and charges from water customers) to fund annual operations. <br /> Staff knew that the growth in expenditures (mainly Zone 7 water costs) was outpacing <br /> the growth in water revenues and a rate increase was necessary; hence the rate <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.