CCMIN121610WK - Laserfiche WebLink

Mayor Hosterman questioned the dilemma with building out to the stated densities, and Mr. Reber said there are four different product types in the package which he briefly reviewed. They need to go to the lower density building units to make this financial viable from the beginning, given setbacks, a portion of diagonal parking that tapers out with the acceleration lane on Owens, and live /work units. They also have a major concern with putting retail on Parcel 2 because it will eat into the amount of density and does not have the synergy being located across from BART. Mayor Hosterman invited comments and questions from Planning Commissioners and Council Members. Planning Commissioner Pentin said he is interested in circulation, transit, and understands the discussion about retail which is just as important as residential density. He is also interested in circulation of the bike paths, pedestrian use, likes seeing streets slowed down and thanked the applicant team and staff for their hard work. Planning Commissioner Narum said she is very happy with documents, likes a lot of the flexibility, acknowledged that the project will not all be built in 2011, and some things that are not economically viable now might be later. Her largest concern is that she would really like to see a half- to one -acre public park somewhere in one of the parcels. She is also a member of the Housing Element Task Force. There are a number of properties in this general area that could be subject to rezoning for high density housing. She thinks the City should try to develop a public park and she would like to see the property owners have a discussion with staff on if there was some way to get a park with flexibility on some non -core PUD standards or discussion about in -lieu park fees. Otherwise, she thinks the exercise was great, appreciates the visioning and new concepts. Planning Commission Chair Olson said he was delighted to see the package and acknowledged the amount of work done in a relatively short period of time. He voiced a concern with schools and noted he has had limited exposure with TOD in other areas through reading, but thinks solving the school issue will be a key item. He knows historically the town has not had busing but it may be that limited busing be considered with respect to this area to help solve the school problem. His second concern is the issue of affordable housing. The City is under pressure to provide an answer and the specifics of affordable housing having not been addressed, and at some point they will need to be. He asked the task force to develop at least a list of financing alternatives available to us. Someone made the point that Pleasanton is a PDA which will hopefully provide funding that could be used to finance affordable housing. Planning Commissioner Blank acknowledged the 14 meetings of the task force since March which is impressive. He agrees with the need for flexibility but asked for clear flexibility. He also agrees this is a framework as opposed to an actual PUD development and a vision, and outlined the following items as comments: He assumes condo conversions would not be permitted in these areas. Looking at the list of neighborhood uses, he saw some odd things such as "stamp and coin stores" and also "hobby shops ". One is specific and one is general, and he encouraged they be made one way or another. He is very concerned with affordable housing. Typically, the denser the environment, the more affordable the housing. It also might allow for the open space. He agrees the open space in this environment seems light. If there is a proposal for tucked up under garages, he wants to ensure handicapped spaces are included. He was not sure he supported trading off balconies with open space, but to a great extent the Joint Workshop Minutes Page 7 of 13 December 16, 2010