My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
011811
>
10 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2011 3:18:09 PM
Creation date
1/12/2011 1:17:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/18/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
10 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. and Ms. Perry have also stated that they are not completely against a two -story <br />structure at the subject property, but would like to see the second story set back further <br />from the mutual side property line or located closer to the rear of the home. Figure 5 <br />below shows photographs taken from Homer Court and from inside the Perry's home. <br />FIGURE 5: PHOTOS SHOWING VIEWS OF 6104 HOMER COURT FROM STREET AND <br />VIEWS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM FRONT ROOM OF 6104 HOMER <br />COURT <br />ANALYSIS <br />The existing juxtaposition of the home on the subject property and the homes on the <br />surrounding properties make for a challenging situation to mitigate all concerns from all <br />parties involved. The development standards for the property (setback requirements, <br />floor area ratio, height requirements) required by the Municipal Code are intended to <br />provide adequate separation between structures and establish parameters for which <br />development may occur and minimize impact on neighboring properties. The following <br />section serves to analyze and provide information to the Planning Commission <br />regarding site configuration, two -story homes in the Val Vista neighborhood, and the <br />sizes of homes in the vicinity of the subject property. <br />Case No. PAP -146, Appeal of F'ADR -2090 <br />Page 8 of 17 <br />Planning Commission <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.